On 2019-11-20 11:05, William Lallemand wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 10:19:20AM +0100, Christian Ruppert wrote:
Hi William,
thanks for the patch. I'll test it later today. What I actually
wanted to
achieve is:
https://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/2.0/management.html#4 Then
HAProxy tries t
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 10:19:20AM +0100, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> Hi William,
>
> thanks for the patch. I'll test it later today. What I actually wanted to
> achieve is: https://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/2.0/management.html#4 Then
> HAProxy tries to bind to all listening ports. If some fa
Hi William,
thanks for the patch. I'll test it later today.
What I actually wanted to achieve is:
https://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/2.0/management.html#4
Then HAProxy tries to bind to all listening ports. If some fatal errors
happen
(eg: address not present on the system, permission denied)
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 04:19:26PM +0100, William Lallemand wrote:
> > I then add another bind for port 80, which is in use by squid already
> > and try to reload HAProxy. It takes some time until it failes:
> >
> > Nov 19 14:39:21 894a0f616fec haproxy[2978]: [WARNING] 322/143921 (2978)
> > : Re
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 03:45:09PM +0100, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> Hi list,
>
Hello,
> I'm facing some issues with already in use ports and the fallback
> feature, during a reload. SO_REUSEPORT already makes ist easier/better
> but not perfect, as there are still cases were it fails.
> In my
Hi list,
I'm facing some issues with already in use ports and the fallback
feature, during a reload. SO_REUSEPORT already makes ist easier/better
but not perfect, as there are still cases were it fails.
In my test case I've got a Squid running on port 80 and a HAProxy with
"master-worker no-ex
6 matches
Mail list logo
