total session number in the Statistics Report page

2012-04-15 Thread Alon M
Hi , i was wondering is some one could explain why there is always a small difference between the total session on our single listener called - pm - 600885 to the back end server of that listener called -localPM600845 below is the config : global log 127.0.0.1 local0

RE: Performance optimization on VMWare VM's

2012-04-15 Thread Lukas Tribus
Does that mean Sandy/Ivy Bridge based Intel Platforms can't be undoubtedly recommended for high performance usage with haproxy or is there a workaround? What platform would you recommend for a new setup?

Re: Performance optimization on VMWare VM's

2012-04-15 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 05:35:59PM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote: Does that mean Sandy/Ivy Bridge based Intel Platforms can't be undoubtedly recommended for high performance usage with haproxy or is there a workaround? It's never all white or black. It also depends on the L3 cache latency. My

Re: total session number in the Statistics Report page

2012-04-15 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi, On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 02:34:05PM +, Alon M wrote: Hi , i was wondering is some one could explain why there is always a small difference between the total session on our single listener called - pm - 600885 to the back end server of that listener called -localPM

Re: Performance optimization on VMWare VM's

2012-04-15 Thread Baptiste
Hey, You have to reserve resources for the VM. FYI, At exceliance, we were able to go up to 55K rps in a VM on a core i7. You'll need to tune your sysctl as well. cheers On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote: On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 05:35:59PM +0200, Lukas Tribus