Hi Henry,
that sounds like a very serious bug indeed.
I suggest you take a traffic capture with a ring buffer and
capture the exact frontend traffic.
You can do this with "dumpcap" for example, something like
should do it (if your frontend traffic is tcp port 80):
dumpcap -i eth0 -p -s0 -b d
Hi Henry,
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 05:06:31AM +, Henry Qian wrote:
> 3) Tried to trace what haproxy process is doing though "strace -c -p $(pid of
> haproxy)". However it returns nothing as well.
Which means it's looping in user mode.
> 4) Used GDB to step though the haproxy process, and find
Good Morning Will,
Which version of haproxy are you running?
I reported a very similar problem in 1.5-dev7 a year ago and Willy
committed a fix on 20120109... has it reared its head again since?
Joe
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.haproxy/7108
-Original Message-
From: Will Gla
Hi Henry,
I found the bug. It happens when hashing a parameter which is not found
(typically an absent URL parameter) and then the connection to the selected
server experiences connection retries, and the server goes down and up
before the redispatching, and is the last server in the farm when the
Hi!
> Hi Henry,
>
> I found the bug. It happens when hashing a parameter which is not found
> (typically an absent URL parameter) and then the connection to the selected
> server experiences connection retries, and the server goes down and up
> before the redispatching, and is the last server in
Hi -- sorry -- should have said. This is haproxy 1.5dev18.
WILL
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 2:15 AM, wrote:
> Good Morning Will,
>
> Which version of haproxy are you running?
>
> I reported a very similar problem in 1.5-dev7 a year ago and Willy
> committed a fix on 20120109... has it reared its
Thanks a lot for the fix. I applied it to our servers and will closely monitor
how it behaves.
From: Willy Tarreau [w...@1wt.eu]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 6:04 AM
To: Henry Qian
Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re: haproxy hit 100% CPU
Hi Henry,
I
Does anyone have anything they could share about using HAProxy for
load-balancing SIP? Positive /or/ negative, of course! :-)
Jonathan
Haha, interesting job.
I think the next step is to push haproxy to the open space and balance
satellite traffic.
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 08:22:26PM +0400, Kron wrote:
> Haha, interesting job.
> I think the next step is to push haproxy to the open space and balance
> satellite traffic.
:-)
I think you didn't read till the end, precisely the last two words !
Willy
On Apr 12, 2013, at 11:26 AM, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
> Does anyone have anything they could share about using HAProxy for
> load-balancing SIP? Positive /or/ negative, of course! :-)
HAProxy doesn't support UDP traffic, so SIP won't work very well. Maybe look at
LVS, or one of the numerous SI
Hi,
I'm trying to follow this blog post:
http://blog.exceliance.fr/2012/10/03/ssl-client-certificate-management-at-application-level/,
but I can't get the client certificate to work with 1.5dev18.
Specifically, I get these errors:
139701807867552:error:14094418:SSL routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:tls
Hi Thomas,
> I'm trying to follow this blog post:
> http://blog.exceliance.fr/2012/10/03/ssl-client-certificate-management-at-application-level/,
> but I can't get the client certificate to work with 1.5dev18.
Could you try a few older releases, specifically dev12, 13 and 14 (which is
aroun
Hi,
I am a newbie to haproxy and was wondering if someone can confirm that the
following config is valid? Effectively I would like to load balanced two
servers on multiple ports.
Listen mybackendLB
bind 10.6.200.14:555,10.6.200.14:8009,10.6.200.14:443
mode tcp
balance roundrobin
I'm having trouble getting haproxy to route multipart requests. Any help
would be appreciated.
The idea is to route all file uploads to a different server from the main.
However, it doesn't seem to ever match the multipart in the request
headers. I've tried "hdr_beg(Content-Type) multipart" and "p
Il 13/04/2013 01:01, Vicky Perdana:
Hi,
I am a newbie to haproxy and was wondering if someone can confirm that the
following config is valid? Effectively I would like to load balanced two
servers on multiple ports.
Listen mybackendLB
bind 10.6.200.14:555,10.6.200.14:8009,10.6.200.14:44
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 07:50:13AM +0200, Marco Corte wrote:
> Il 13/04/2013 01:01, Vicky Perdana:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I am a newbie to haproxy and was wondering if someone can confirm that the
> >following config is valid? Effectively I would like to load balanced two
> >servers on multiple ports.
>
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 09:04:00PM -0700, Hong Quach wrote:
> I'm having trouble getting haproxy to route multipart requests. Any help
> would be appreciated.
>
> The idea is to route all file uploads to a different server from the main.
> However, it doesn't seem to ever match the multipart
18 matches
Mail list logo