Re: Failed to compile haproxy with lua on Solaris 10

Le 13/05/2017 à 08:09, Willy Tarreau a écrit : > Hi Benoît, > > On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 07:32:10AM +0200, Benoît GARNIER wrote: >> Le 12/05/2017 à 15:54, Willy Tarreau a écrit : >>> Hi Benoît, >>> >>> On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 08:50:33AM +0200, Benoît GARNIER wrote: >>> (...) If you do the

Re: Failed to compile haproxy with lua on Solaris 10

Hi Benoît, On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 07:32:10AM +0200, Benoît GARNIER wrote: > Le 12/05/2017 à 15:54, Willy Tarreau a écrit : > > Hi Benoît, > > > > On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 08:50:33AM +0200, Benoît GARNIER wrote: > > (...) > >> If you do the following operation : time_t => localtime() => struct tm

Re: Failed to compile haproxy with lua on Solaris 10

On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 08:44:06AM +0200, Benoît GARNIER wrote: > Time handling is not easy. I hate to say that, but POSIX and glibc > manage to make it even harder. Especially the timezone global handling > which is not thread-safe as you pinpointed. > Anyway, free conding a simple timegm() is

Re: Failed to compile haproxy with lua on Solaris 10

Le 13/05/2017 à 09:46, Willy Tarreau a écrit : > On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 08:44:06AM +0200, Benoît GARNIER wrote: >> Time handling is not easy. I hate to say that, but POSIX and glibc >> manage to make it even harder. Especially the timezone global handling >> which is not thread-safe as you

Re: Failed to compile haproxy with lua on Solaris 10

On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 10:42:58AM +0200, Benoît GARNIER wrote: > Le 13/05/2017 à 09:46, Willy Tarreau a écrit : > > On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 08:44:06AM +0200, Benoît GARNIER wrote: > >> Time handling is not easy. I hate to say that, but POSIX and glibc > >> manage to make it even harder.

Re: Failed to compile haproxy with lua on Solaris 10

Le 13/05/2017 à 11:27, Willy Tarreau a écrit : > On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 10:42:58AM +0200, Benoît GARNIER wrote: >> Le 13/05/2017 à 09:46, Willy Tarreau a écrit : >>> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 08:44:06AM +0200, Benoît GARNIER wrote: Time handling is not easy. I hate to say that, but POSIX and

haproxy "inter" and "timeout check", retries and "fall"

Hi all, The version of haproxy I use is: # haproxy -version HA-Proxy version 1.5.2 2014/07/12 Copyright 2000-2014 Willy Tarreau I have a question regarding the Health Check. In the documentation of haproxy, it mentions the below for the "timeout check" and "inter": For

Re: hostname to IP converter possible?

Hi all, As Willy said, I'm reviewing the internal DNS architecture to make it fully autonomous and more flexible with a registration mechanism and callbacks system. First purpose is to mutualise DNS resources (cache of the response, one resolution at a time for a query), second is to enable dns