Re: haproxy-1.8 build failure on FreeBSD/i386 (clang)

2018-02-14 Thread Dmitry Sivachenko
> On 12 Feb 2018, at 17:37, David CARLIER wrote: > > I think I m the one behing this relatively recent change ... why not adding > in the condition the architecture ? e.g. !defined(__clang__) && > !defined(__i386__) ... something like this... > > Hope it is useful. >

Re: haproxy-1.8 build failure on FreeBSD/i386 (clang)

2018-02-14 Thread David CARLIER
Whatever works best for you. Regards. On 14 February 2018 at 11:09, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote: > > > On 12 Feb 2018, at 17:37, David CARLIER wrote: > > > > I think I m the one behing this relatively recent change ... why not > adding in the condition the

Having hard time finding a translator you need?

2018-02-14 Thread Mark Blair
Hi there, Aren't you tired looking yet again for a perfect translator? If that is the case, seek no longer - we have the solution for you Our company provides modern online translation services. We guarantee quick and convenient translations of documents, websites or files. We cooperate with

Re: haproxy 1.8 ssl backend server leads to server session aborts

2018-02-14 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 05:29:57PM +0100, Olivier Houchard wrote: > Hi Willy, > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 08:05:44PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Hi Olivier, > > Such type of construct tends to scare me (probably because I'm not reading > > the whole code). It means we're supposed to set an

Re: slowly move connections away from failed real server to remaining real server.

2018-02-14 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 2/13/2018 7:49 AM, Andrew Smalley wrote: > We have had a request and not sure if there is any way to implement this. > > Simply think of two real servers being loadbalanced. one fails all the > connections are moved to the remaining server overloading it. > > What we want is for the traffic

Re: haproxy 1.8 ssl backend server leads to server session aborts

2018-02-14 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 06:20:42PM +0100, Mateusz Malek wrote: > Hi, > > On 14.02.2018 17:53, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 05:29:57PM +0100, Olivier Houchard wrote: > > > What about what's attached, instead ? > > I think it should work. Mateusz, care to give it a try to

Re: haproxy 1.8 ssl backend server leads to server session aborts

2018-02-14 Thread Olivier Houchard
Hi Willy, On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 08:05:44PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi Olivier, > Such type of construct tends to scare me (probably because I'm not reading > the whole code). It means we're supposed to set an error by default unless > we pass by a specific path. I fear that we'll get

Re: haproxy 1.8 ssl backend server leads to server session aborts

2018-02-14 Thread Mateusz Małek
Hi, On 14.02.2018 17:53, Willy Tarreau wrote: On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 05:29:57PM +0100, Olivier Houchard wrote: What about what's attached, instead ? I think it should work. Mateusz, care to give it a try to confirm ? If OK, I'll merge it. I confirm, with this patch applied problem is gone.

Re: slowly move connections away from failed real server to remaining real server.

2018-02-14 Thread Andrew Smalley
Hello Shawn Thank you for your reply. It is pretty much a verification of what we thought this end. Ill go back to the customer and let them know what Microsoft suggest is not possible. Andruw Smalley Loadbalancer.org Ltd. www.loadbalancer.org +1 888 867 9504 / +44 (0)330 380 1064