Re: segfault in haproxy=1.8.4

2018-03-25 Thread Максим Куприянов
Hi! It's been almost 2 weeks since I've installed the patch and there were no segfaults since then. It seems that the problem is fixed now. Thank you! 2018-03-19 23:16 GMT+03:00 William Dauchy : > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 08:41:16PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > For me,

Re: patch: fix build when USE_THREAD is not defined

2018-03-25 Thread Tim Düsterhus
Илья, Am 24.03.2018 um 19:42 schrieb Илья Шипицин: > in your patch comparision + empty loop will be executed even if USE_THREADS > is not defined. > not very big performance overhead actually. > I'm sure that any compiler able to compile haproxy properly is able to remove the loop as part of

multithreading issuse in haproxy 1.8.5

2018-03-25 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
I am try to use multithreading w/ haproxy 1.8.5 (on FreeBSD 11-stable) and see high and saw-tooth CPU consume. I am use next config: global nbproc 1 nbthread 2 cpu-map auto:1/1-2 0-1 I am use for comprassion haproxy 1.7.10 w/ next config: global nbproc 2

Re: lua socket api settimeout in seconds vs. milliseconds

2018-03-25 Thread Tim Düsterhus
Willy, Am 08.03.2018 um 21:15 schrieb Thierry Fournier: > 3 new patch in attachement to consider for the initial subject of > this thread. > did you miss these patches from Thierry to the Lua subsystem? Best regards Tim Düsterhus

Re: lua socket api settimeout in seconds vs. milliseconds

2018-03-25 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Tim, On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 12:15:02AM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > Willy, > > Am 08.03.2018 um 21:15 schrieb Thierry Fournier: > > 3 new patch in attachement to consider for the initial subject of > > this thread. > > > > did you miss these patches from Thierry to the Lua subsystem?