Tweet about Facebook's implementation and deployment of QUIC

2018-12-28 Thread Aleksandar Lazic
Hi. I just have seen this tweet, maybe it's also interesting for you. Subodh Iyengar (@__subodh) twitterte um 10:18 nachm. on Mi., Dez. 26, 2018: Slides for my presentation at ACM conext on Facebook's implementation and deployment of QUIC are now live

Re: Question about Maglev algorithm

2018-12-28 Thread Aleksandar Lazic
Well as far as I understood the pdf one of the biggest difference is that Maglev is a distributed system where the consistent hash is for local system. What I think is if consistent hash uses the peers table for balancing it could be similar to Maglev, but I'm not a algo expert, just an Idea.

Question about Maglev algorithm

2018-12-28 Thread Aleksandar Lazic
Hi. Have anyone take a look into the Maglev algorithm ? This paper looks very interesting https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.com/en//pubs/archive/44824.pdf Regards Aleks

Re: Question about Maglev algorithm

2018-12-28 Thread Valentin Vidic
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 07:11:24PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: > Have anyone take a look into the Maglev algorithm ? > > This paper looks very interesting > https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.com/en//pubs/archive/44824.pdf Seems to be in IPVS already:

Re: Question about Maglev algorithm

2018-12-28 Thread Aaron West
I've not used it yet with IPVS because I have nothing with a new enough Kernel (4.18+ I think), however, isn't this quite similar to HAProxy's consistent hash options? Aaron Loadbalancer.org

htx with compression issue, "Gunzip error: Body lacks gzip magics"

2018-12-28 Thread PiBa-NL
Hi List, When using compression with htx, and a slightly delayed body content it will prefix some rubbish and corrupt the gzip header.. Below output i get with attached test.. Removing http-use-htx 'fixes' the test. This happens with both 1.9.0 and todays commit a2dbeb2, not sure if this

Re: Question about Maglev algorithm

2018-12-28 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 07:55:11PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: > Well as far as I understood the pdf one of the biggest difference is that > Maglev is a distributed system where the consistent hash is for local system. No, not at all. The difference is that it's designed for packet processing