Hi Pieter,
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 12:38:42AM +0200, PiBa-NL wrote:
> After a bit more fiddling i noticed that the new startup method seems more
> CPU intensive.
> Also it can be seen the vtest does take a bit longer to pass 1.3sec v.s.
> 0.8sec even though the health-check durations themselves
The path of UNIX server connections should be sent as an argument to
the external-check command, to mimic how it behaves with IPv4 and v6
server connections, and UNIX proxy listeners. The port is set to an
empty string (existing behavior) instead of "NOT_USED" (to mimic
the proxy_port argument) to
We are in the process of evaluating upgrading to 1.9.8 from 1.8.17,
and we are seeing a roughly 70% increase in sockets in TIME_WAIT on
our haproxy servers with a mostly idle server cluster
$ sudo netstat | grep 'TIME_WAIT' | wc -l
Looking at the source/destination of this it seems likely that
Willy,
> > Looks like it decided that non-letter characters had to be encoded.
> > We're using FD_ISSET() to look up the characters in the character
> > encoding map because this was convenient in the past, but maybe it's
> > time to have a native implementation of a bit address lookup and get
Hi Willy,
Op 10-6-2019 om 16:14 schreef Willy Tarreau:
Hi Pieter,
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 04:06:13PM +0200, PiBa-NL wrote:
Things certainly look better again now regarding this issue.
Ah cool!
Running the test repeatedly, and manually looking over the results its
pretty much as good as it
Hello Haproxy.com,
You have a neatly designed website. It's evident that you have put in a lot
of effort and (dollars) to mapping growth prospects objectively. However, I
doubt your current web presence meeting your need.
Before you consider my email like rest all standard template
Hi Willy,
Op 10-6-2019 om 11:09 schreef Willy Tarreau:
Hi Pieter,
On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 06:07:09AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Pieter,
On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 11:32:18PM +0200, PiBa-NL wrote:
Hi Willy,
After the commit "6ec902a MINOR: threads: serialize threads initialization"
however
Hi Pieter,
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 04:06:13PM +0200, PiBa-NL wrote:
> Things certainly look better again now regarding this issue.
Ah cool!
> Running the test repeatedly, and manually looking over the results its
> pretty much as good as it was before. There seems to be a 1 ms increase in
> the
Hi Pieter,
On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 06:07:09AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Pieter,
>
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 11:32:18PM +0200, PiBa-NL wrote:
> > Hi Willy,
> >
> > After the commit "6ec902a MINOR: threads: serialize threads initialization"
> > however i have failing / slow health checks
9 matches
Mail list logo