Re: Upgrade from 1.7 to 2.0 = increased CPU usage

2019-07-23 Thread Elias Abacioglu
Hi Lukas, I will send the strace to you and Willy so I don't spam the entire maillist with a 10MB tarball. /Elias On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 12:11 AM Lukas Tribus wrote: > Hello Elias, > > > On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 at 17:52, Elias Abacioglu > wrote: > > > > Ok, I just tried HAProxy 2.0.2. > > I see

[ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.9.9

2019-07-23 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi, HAProxy 1.9.9 was released on 2019/07/23. It added 110 new commits after version 1.9.8. This release is large because over the last month several bugs affected 2.0 and likely 1.9 and it was uncertain whether some of the fixes to be backported to 1.9 were partially responsible for those bugs

Re: [PATCH] MINOR: contrib/spoa_server: Port SPOA server to Python 3

2019-07-23 Thread Aleksandar Lazic
Hi. Am 23.07.2019 um 15:34 schrieb Vedran Furac: > Hello, > > Attached is a simple port of SPOA with embedded Python 2 interpreter to > Python 3 > following the official Python porting documentation. I tried to keep the > changes > at minimum. Tested on my local Debian with Python v3.7 using

[ANNOUNCE] haproxy-2.0.3 (Security update)

2019-07-23 Thread Christopher Faulet
Hi, HAProxy 2.0.3 was released on 2019/07/23. It added 19 new commits after version 2.0.2. This release contains a security fix in the HTX analyzers, in the code responsible of the client-side or the server-side cookies parsing. The bug happens when a Cookie or a Set-Cookie header value starts

[PATCH] MINOR: contrib/spoa_server: Port SPOA server to Python 3

2019-07-23 Thread Vedran Furac
Hello, Attached is a simple port of SPOA with embedded Python 2 interpreter to Python 3 following the official Python porting documentation. I tried to keep the changes at minimum. Tested on my local Debian with Python v3.7 using the provided example script. Regards, Vedran >From

Re: [PATCH] MINOR: contrib/spoa_server: Port SPOA server to Python 3

2019-07-23 Thread Vedran Furac
Hey, On 23. 07. 2019. 15:47, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: > Hi. > > Am 23.07.2019 um 15:34 schrieb Vedran Furac: >> Hello, >> >> Attached is a simple port of SPOA with embedded Python 2 interpreter to >> Python 3 >> following the official Python porting documentation. I tried to keep the >> changes

Re: Upgrade from 1.7 to 2.0 = increased CPU usage

2019-07-23 Thread Lukas Tribus
Hello Elias, could you try 2.0.3 please? It was just released today and fixes a CPU hogging issue. cheers, lukas

Re: FreeBSD CI builds fail

2019-07-23 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi guys, On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 08:37:37PM +0200, Jerome Magnin wrote: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 07:09:57PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > > Jérôme, > > Ilya, > > > > I noticed that FreeBSD CI fails since > > https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/commit/885f64fb6da0a349dd3182d21d337b528225c517. > >

reg-tests/checks/tcp-check_multiple_ports.vtc fails on FreeBSD

2019-07-23 Thread Илья Шипицин
can someone have a look ? https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5737816791711744

FreeBSD CI builds fail

2019-07-23 Thread Tim Düsterhus
Jérôme, Ilya, I noticed that FreeBSD CI fails since https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/commit/885f64fb6da0a349dd3182d21d337b528225c517. One example is here: https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/runs/169980019 It should be investigated whether the reg-test is valid for FreeBSD and either be fixed

Re: FreeBSD CI builds fail

2019-07-23 Thread Jerome Magnin
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 07:09:57PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > Jérôme, > Ilya, > > I noticed that FreeBSD CI fails since > https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/commit/885f64fb6da0a349dd3182d21d337b528225c517. > > > One example is here: https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/runs/169980019 > > It