Re: FreeBSD CI builds fail

2019-07-24 Thread Илья Шипицин
ср, 24 июл. 2019 г. в 08:55, Willy Tarreau : > Hi guys, > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 08:37:37PM +0200, Jerome Magnin wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 07:09:57PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > > > Jérôme, > > > Ilya, > > > > > > I noticed that FreeBSD CI fails since > > > >

Re: FreeBSD CI builds fail

2019-07-24 Thread Tim Düsterhus
Willy, Am 24.07.19 um 05:55 schrieb Willy Tarreau: > I also noticed the build failure but couldn't find any link to the build > history to figure when it started to fail. How did you figure that the > commit above was the first one ? While I did it as Ilya did by scrolling through GitHub's

Re: FreeBSD CI builds fail

2019-07-24 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:01:33AM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > Am 24.07.19 um 05:55 schrieb Willy Tarreau: > > I also noticed the build failure but couldn't find any link to the build > > history to figure when it started to fail. How did you figure that the > > commit above was the first one ?

Subscribe

2019-07-24 Thread haproxy.laurent.petit
Subscribe

Haproxy reload and maps

2019-07-24 Thread Sachin Shetty
Hi, We are using maps extensively in our architecture to map host headers to backends. The maps are seeded dynamically with a lua handler to an external service as requests arrive, there are no pre-seeded values in the map, the physical map file is empty On haproxy reload at peak traffic, the

Re: Upgrade from 1.7 to 2.0 = increased CPU usage

2019-07-24 Thread Elias Abacioglu
Hi Lukas, 2.0.3 still has the same issue, after 1-3 minutes it goes to using 100% of it's available cores. I've created a new strace file. Will send it to you and Willy. Thanks, Elias On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 8:31 PM Lukas Tribus wrote: > Hello Elias, > > > could you try 2.0.3 please? > > > It

haproxy=2.0.3: ereq counter grow in tcp-mode since haproxy=2.0

2019-07-24 Thread Максим Куприянов
Hi! I've mentioned that since moving from 1.9.8 to 2.0-branch of haproxy, ereq counter of frontend tcp-mode sections began to grow. I had zeroes in that counter before haproxy 2.0, now the number of "error requests" is much higher. Example: listen sample.service:1234 bind ipv6@xxx:yyy mode

Partnership - guest posts or sponsored content

2019-07-24 Thread Dennis P .
Hello, I already tried to get in touch but didn't get any response... not sure if you receved this? If not interested, please just let me know. My name is Dennis and I'm a Blog Outreach specialist, I saw your blog on haproxy.com and decided to get in touch. I think that a lot of my

Cannot enable a config "disabled" frontend via socket command

2019-07-24 Thread Martin van Es
Exactly this problem: https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg19356.html is still true for frontends, so I can't start a frontend in disabled mode and later on enable it via socket. Tested version: 1.8.19 in Debian buster. Best regards, Martin

load-server-state-from-file "automatic" transfer?

2019-07-24 Thread Daniel Schneller
Hi! I have been looking into load-server-state-from file to prevent 500 errors being reported after a service reload. Currently we are seeing these, because the new instance comes up and first wants to see the minimum configured number of health checks for a backend server to succeed, before it

2.0.3 High CPU Usage

2019-07-24 Thread ngaugler
Hello, I am currently running Haproxy 1.6.14-1ppa1~xenial-66af4a1 2018/01/06. There are many features that were implemented in 1.8, 1.9 and 2.0 that would benefit my deployments.  I tested 2.0.3-1ppa1~xenial last night but unfortunately found it to be using excessive amounts of CPU and had

Question About Haproxy

2019-07-24 Thread Brian Altstatt
Hi! We're a local tech company in MN, USA and would love to advertise on Haproxy.org. Doesn't look like you've got any ads on the home page currently...is that something we can talk about? We'd just be looking for a small text mention or a tiny logo-nothing crazy or obtrusive. Please let me

Re: Upgrade from 1.7 to 2.0 = increased CPU usage

2019-07-24 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Elias, On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:01:22AM +0200, Elias Abacioglu wrote: > Hi Lukas, > > 2.0.3 still has the same issue, after 1-3 minutes it goes to using 100% of > it's available cores. > I've created a new strace file. Will send it to you and Willy. Thanks for testing. I've looked at your

Re: Upgrade from 1.7 to 2.0 = increased CPU usage

2019-07-24 Thread Elias Abacioglu
Hi Willy, This would explain the 503s ``` # change a 503 response into a 204(a friendly decline). errorfile 503 /etc/haproxy/errors/204.http acl is_disable path_beg /getuid/rogue-ad-exchange # http-request deny defaults to 403, change it to a 503, # which is a masked 204 since haproxy

Send http 413 response

2019-07-24 Thread Joao Morais
Hello list. I'm trying to send a HTTP 413 to the user based on the hdr(Content-Length). What I've tried so far: 1. Create a http413 backend only with `errorfile 400` + `http-request deny_status 400`. In the frontend, configure a `use_backend http413 if `. This is my current approach but it

Re: Upgrade from 1.7 to 2.0 = increased CPU usage

2019-07-24 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 02:36:49AM +0200, Elias Abacioglu wrote: > Hi Willy, > > This would explain the 503s > ``` > # change a 503 response into a 204(a friendly decline). > errorfile 503 /etc/haproxy/errors/204.http > > acl is_disable path_beg /getuid/rogue-ad-exchange > # http-request