[PR] DOC: fixed typo in management.txt

2019-08-23 Thread PR Bot
Dear list! Author: n9 Number of patches: 1 This is an automated relay of the Github pull request: DOC: fixed typo in management.txt Patch title(s): DOC: fixed typo in management.txt Link: https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/pull/234 Edit locally: wget

Re: [PR] DOC: fixed typo in management.txt

2019-08-23 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 09:23:04AM +, PR Bot wrote: > Patch title(s): >DOC: fixed typo in management.txt > > Link: >https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/pull/234 > > Edit locally: >wget https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/pull/234.patch && vi 234.patch > > Apply locally: >curl

Re: segmentation fault on 1.8.21

2019-08-23 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Joao, On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:10:43PM -0300, Joao Morais wrote: > > Hi list, I can reproduce a segmentation fault on HAProxy 1.8.21. No problem > with 1.8.20, 1.9.10 or 2.0.5. Is there anything else I can provide or test on > my environment? Thank you for this report. The patch below

Re: segmentation fault on 1.8.21

2019-08-23 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 11:47:46AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > In the mean time you can apply the patch above. It will reject the > first hunk but the second one applies and will address the issue. I've now backported all the pending patches for 1.8. You can git-pull it if it's easier for you.

Re: segmentation fault on 1.8.21

2019-08-23 Thread Joao Morais
> Em 23 de ago de 2019, à(s) 08:16, Willy Tarreau escreveu: > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 11:47:46AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: >> In the mean time you can apply the patch above. It will reject the >> first hunk but the second one applies and will address the issue. > > I've now backported

Re: segmentation fault on 1.8.21

2019-08-23 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 08:34:02PM -0300, Joao Morais wrote: > > I've now backported all the pending patches for 1.8. You can git-pull > > it if it's easier for you. > > Hi Willy, current 1.8 code (commit dcb8c97) fixes the issue we found on spoe, > thanks! Perfect, thanks for confirming! I'm