Re: Issue with checks after 2.0.6

2019-09-14 Thread GARDAIS Ionel
Same. I had to disable HTX because I had issues with some corrupted payloads. I'll give a new try to HTX as 2.0.6 corrects issues with TLS. -- Ionel GARDAIS Tech'Advantage CIO - IT Team manager - Mail original - De: "Aleksandar Lazic" À: "Ionel GARDAIS" Cc: "haproxy" Envoyé: Samedi

Re: Issue with checks after 2.0.6

2019-09-14 Thread Lukas Tribus
Hello, On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 1:08 PM GARDAIS Ionel wrote: > > Hi, > > I've just upgraded to 2.0.6 and all server checks went erratic. > I had to disable checks for the servers to be reachable. What was the previous release that worked for you? 2.0.5 or something older? Thanks, Lukas

Re: Issue with checks after 2.0.6

2019-09-14 Thread Aleksandar Lazic
When you enable htx do you have the same problems? Comment in `no option http-use-htx` Regards Aleks Sat Sep 14 14:12:30 GMT+02:00 2019 GARDAIS Ionel : > Also, haproxy and servers are on the same subnet : no filtering nor routing > between them. > Ping as no troubles, servers are not

Re: Linux Builds broken on Travis CI

2019-09-14 Thread Илья Шипицин
it turned out that ASAN is "the root cause" of those failures. let us disable it for a while (I attached patch) пт, 13 сент. 2019 г. в 19:23, Илья Шипицин : > > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019, 3:49 PM Willy Tarreau wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 03:45:21PM +0500, ??? wrote: >> > now build

Issue with checks after 2.0.6

2019-09-14 Thread GARDAIS Ionel
Hi, I've just upgraded to 2.0.6 and all server checks went erratic. I had to disable checks for the servers to be reachable. The observed behavior was a flip-flap (but mostly down) of server availability with L4TOUT when the server was considered unresponsive. Ionel -- 232 avenue

Re: Issue with checks after 2.0.6

2019-09-14 Thread GARDAIS Ionel
Sure. Note : as soon as I remove the check from the server line then 'systemctl reload haproxy', access is OK. # haproxy -vv HA-Proxy version 2.0.6-1~bpo9+1 2019/09/14 - https://haproxy.org/ Build options : TARGET = linux-glibc CPU = generic CC = gcc CFLAGS = -O2 -g -O2

stable-bot: WARNING: 8 bug fixes in queue for next release - 1.8

2019-09-14 Thread stable-bot
Hi, This is a friendly bot that watches fixes pending for the next haproxy-stable release! One such e-mail is sent periodically once patches are waiting in the last maintenance branch, and an ideal release date is computed based on the severity of these fixes and their merge date. Responses

stable-bot: INFO: 1 bug fixes in queue for next release - 2.0

2019-09-14 Thread stable-bot
Hi, This is a friendly bot that watches fixes pending for the next haproxy-stable release! One such e-mail is sent periodically once patches are waiting in the last maintenance branch, and an ideal release date is computed based on the severity of these fixes and their merge date. Responses

stable-bot: WARNING: 17 bug fixes in queue for next release - 1.9

2019-09-14 Thread stable-bot
Hi, This is a friendly bot that watches fixes pending for the next haproxy-stable release! One such e-mail is sent periodically once patches are waiting in the last maintenance branch, and an ideal release date is computed based on the severity of these fixes and their merge date. Responses

Re: Issue with checks after 2.0.6

2019-09-14 Thread Aleksandar Lazic
Hi. Am 14.09.2019 um 13:08 schrieb GARDAIS Ionel: > Hi, > > I've just upgraded to 2.0.6 and all server checks went erratic. > I had to disable checks for the servers to be reachable. > > The observed behavior was a flip-flap (but mostly down) of server availability > with L4TOUT when the server

Re: Issue with checks after 2.0.6

2019-09-14 Thread GARDAIS Ionel
Also, haproxy and servers are on the same subnet : no filtering nor routing between them. Ping as no troubles, servers are not overloaded by other connections. -- Ionel GARDAIS Tech'Advantage CIO - IT Team manager - Mail original - De: "Ionel GARDAIS" À: "Aleksandar Lazic" Cc: