Hi,
This is a friendly bot that watches fixes pending for the next haproxy-stable
release! One such e-mail is sent periodically once patches are waiting in the
last maintenance branch, and an ideal release date is computed based on the
severity of these fixes and their merge date. Responses
Without wishing to second guess your operational setup, are all of those
services (client machines, haproxy, anti-spam boxes) on your network i.e.
do they *need* TLS?
Given the insecure nature of email, and the lack of guarantees which you
(or anyone) can make about subsequent point-to-point
Just created an issue now: https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/671
Thanks, Sander
On 6/9/20 2:07 PM, Илья Шипицин wrote:
it is a good report. backtraces are very useful
is there github issue filled for it ? if no, can you please create one ?
I hope, it won't be lost that way
вт, 9 июн.
Good day Guys
I was hoping I can pick you brain and ask for your help.
If any can help and share pointers, it would gratefully be appreciated.
Where I work, we just inherited a series of third party out going spam
servers.
For various reason, we need to loadbalance but more importantly direct
I may have found a solution, that's a bit more elegant (to me)
The idea is to use a lua script to do some weighted sleep depending on data.
the question is: "is this idea good or bad"? especially, will the
"core.msleep" have implications on performance for everybody?
If someone uses all the
it is a good report. backtraces are very useful
is there github issue filled for it ? if no, can you please create one ?
I hope, it won't be lost that way
вт, 9 июн. 2020 г. в 15:13, Sander Hoentjen :
> Is there anybody with a clue? If I need to supply more info I can do so,
> of course.
>
>
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 11:48:42AM +0200, Tim Duesterhus wrote:
> > I think that instead it could be done slightly differently, by using
> > CRYPTO_memcmp() when openssl is present or memcmp() when not, and
> > documenting that the constant time is enforced when haproxy is compiled
>
> I don't
Hello,
i didn't really get what has been changed in this example, and why.
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:46 AM Igor Cicimov
wrote:
> Modify your frontend from the example like this and let us know what
> happens:
>
> frontend proxy
> bind *:80
> stick-table type ip size 100k expire 15s store
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 6:48 PM Stefano Tranquillini
wrote:
> Hello,
> i didn't really get what has been changed in this example, and why.
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:46 AM Igor Cicimov <
> ig...@encompasscorporation.com> wrote:
>
>> Modify your frontend from the example like this and let us
If both users have the same IP then there's a problem, however, if the IPs
are different nginx auto-limits the request per minute to the value given.
i would like to achieve the same functionality in HA, or have a way to cap
the number of calls per IP (or user or whatever) to a certain number.
I
unsubscribe
--
Kind regards,
Stefan Scheglmann
PAAS Developer
E-mail scheglm...@strato.de
Website www.strato.com
STRATO AG | Pascalstraße 10 | 10587 Berlin | Germany
The mandatory information can be found here
https://www.strato-hosting.co.uk/imprint/
Hi,
HAProxy 2.1.7 was released on 2020/06/09. It added 1 new commits
after version 2.1.6.
Only one day after the previous release, this one comes to fix a very annoying
bugs on errorfiles. The copy of errorfiles from a defaults section to a frontend
or a backend was not properly performed,
Modify your frontend from the example like this and let us know what
happens:
frontend proxy
bind *:80
stick-table type ip size 100k expire 15s store http_req_rate(10s)
http-request track-sc0 src table Abuse
use_backend api_delay if { sc_http_req_rate(0) gt 30 }
use_backend
Willy,
Am 09.06.20 um 05:14 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
>> memcmp compares two binary strings in constant time.
>
> (...)
>
> I'd say that the name is quite misleading if you want to enforce the
> constant time requirement, because memcmp() is well known and initially
> I didn't understand the
Is there anybody with a clue? If I need to supply more info I can do so,
of course.
Kind regards,
Sander
On 6/2/20 4:12 PM, Sander Hoentjen wrote:
Hi list,
Some time ago (around april 21st) we were using 1.8.13 and we switched
from nbthread = 1 to nbthread = 4
This seemed stable for us,
15 matches
Mail list logo
