Re: Easy but useful feature missing, anyone interested ?

2020-09-30 Thread Amaury Denoyelle
Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi all, > while revisiting pending issues, I've come across this one, about > the impossibility for an environment variable to produce multiple > words in the configuration: > https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/165 > It can be trivially addressed by adding

Distro maintainers: any interest in backporting EXTRAVERSION ?

2020-09-30 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi all, after discussing with some of my coworkers who were adding a few paches to their local package builds, we figured that in their case the SUBVERS field was not being updated as doing so was quite painful. I realized that we simply reached exactly the same situation as the linux kernel

[PATCH] BUILD: makefile: Enable closefrom() support on Solaris

2020-09-30 Thread Brad Smith
Solaris 9 (released 2002) added support for closefrom(). I bumped the version in the comment to 10 as the default feature flags already has event ports enabled which were introduced in Solaris 10. diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index 197126db5..e7d716dd3 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile

Re: [PATCH] BUILD: makefile: Enable closefrom() support on Solaris

2020-09-30 Thread Brad Smith
On 9/30/2020 4:22 PM, Илья Шипицин wrote: there also several documentation files like this one https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/blob/master/INSTALL#L159 can you please review documentation as well ? That seems to be the only

Re: [PATCH] BUILD: makefile: Enable closefrom() support on Solaris

2020-09-30 Thread Илья Шипицин
there also several documentation files like this one https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/blob/master/INSTALL#L159 can you please review documentation as well ? чт, 1 окт. 2020 г. в 00:49, Brad Smith : > Solaris 9 (released 2002) added support for closefrom(). > > I bumped the version in the

Re: Easy but useful feature missing, anyone interested ?

2020-09-30 Thread Amaury Denoyelle
Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi all, > while revisiting pending issues, I've come across this one, about > the impossibility for an environment variable to produce multiple > words in the configuration: > https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/165 > It can be trivially addressed by adding

[PR] SOCKS4(A)

2020-09-30 Thread PR Bot
Dear list! Author: alexzk1 Number of patches: 30 This is an automated relay of the Github pull request: SOCKS4(A) Patch title(s): trying to resolve server domain using SOCKS4A added htonl for IP fixed access to non-existing address more checks moved domen dump to backend

Re: Easy but useful feature missing, anyone interested ?

2020-09-30 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 08:40:40AM +0200, Amaury Denoyelle wrote: > At the moment I'm always interested to add simple feature, but I also > would like to progress with my patch serie on stats so I'm not sure if I > will have the time for this :/ Yes please, I'd like to merge your final stats

Re: [PATCH] BUILD: makefile: Fix building with closefrom() support enabled

2020-09-30 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 01:04:48AM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > I noticed the USE_CLOSEFROM define was not being passed along like the rest > during the build. (...) Not that much surprised considering it's seldom used. Now applied with your backport note. Thanks! Willy