Re: Hey! I want to partner with you.

2021-07-08 Thread Nova Meyer
Hey, Hope you're having an amazing week! I'm going to assume you're not interested in collaborating with us but still, I wanted to see what you thought of my suggestion to move things along. Let me know if things change. All the Best, Nova -Original Message- Hello, Making

Re: Proposal about new default SSL log format

2021-07-08 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 02:18:32PM +0200, William Lallemand wrote: > I saw that you hesitated between "conn_status" and "conn_err_code", the > "conn_" prefix could be confusing at some point once you try to have > errors on the frontend and the backend side in the same log-format, I > think

Re: ratio spam/useful message

2021-07-08 Thread Julien Pivotto
On 08 Jul 05:40, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi Julien, > > On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 11:06:05AM +0200, Julien Pivotto wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Lately, the ratio spam/useful message on the ML has been quite high. > > Well, that's not what I'm seeing in the archives here: > >

Re: Proposal about new default SSL log format

2021-07-08 Thread William Lallemand
On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 02:48:32PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 02:18:32PM +0200, William Lallemand wrote: > > I saw that you hesitated between "conn_status" and "conn_err_code", the > > "conn_" prefix could be confusing at some point once you try to have > > errors on the

Re: Proposal about new default SSL log format

2021-07-08 Thread William Lallemand
Hello, On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 04:43:53PM +0200, Remi Tricot-Le Breton wrote: > I was indeed more focused on logging SSL related information only, with > the idea that an SSL log line could be displayed after a completed > handshake, hence the lack of upper layer information in the log line. >

[ANNOUNCE] haproxy-2.3.12

2021-07-08 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi, HAProxy 2.3.12 was released on 2021/07/08. It added 2 new commits after version 2.3.11. Please do not use 2.3.11! I failed the backport of the use-after-free bug fix in the lockless pools between 2.4 and 2.3. The pools code in 2.4 was significantly reworked to be cleaner and simpler, and I

Long broken option http_proxy: should we kill it ?

2021-07-08 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi all, Amaury discovered that "option http_proxy" was broken. I quickly checked when it started, and it got broken with the introduction of HTX in 1.9 three years ago. It still used to work in legacy mode in 1.9 and 2.0 but 2.0 uses HTX by default and legacy disappeared from 2.1. Thus to

Re: Long broken option http_proxy: should we kill it ?

2021-07-08 Thread Aleksandar Lazic
On 08.07.21 18:33, Willy Tarreau wrote: Hi all, Amaury discovered that "option http_proxy" was broken. I quickly checked when it started, and it got broken with the introduction of HTX in 1.9 three years ago. It still used to work in legacy mode in 1.9 and 2.0 but 2.0 uses HTX by default and

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-2.3.12

2021-07-08 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 8 July 2021 17:47 +02, Willy Tarreau: > I'm seeing that at least Vincent was fast enough to package 2.3.11 for > debian 10, I hope nobody deployed it yet. I'm really sorry for the mess. > For those who are wondering, 2.4 was not affected. The new packages are available! -- Let the data

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-2.3.12

2021-07-08 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 07:11:27PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ? 8 July 2021 17:47 +02, Willy Tarreau: > > > I'm seeing that at least Vincent was fast enough to package 2.3.11 for > > debian 10, I hope nobody deployed it yet. I'm really sorry for the mess. > > For those who are wondering,