HAProxy 1.7.5 forwards requests blockwise

2017-04-28 Thread Daniel Heitepriem
t instead connecting to the Apache zones directly, all benchmark requests are handled continously. Is this expected behaviour or did we do something wrong? Thank you very much and best regards, Daniel Heitepriem

Re: HAProxy makes backend unresponsive when handling multiple thousand connections per second

2017-06-21 Thread Daniel Heitepriem
is also quite low (200-800MB). Regards, Daniel Am 21.06.17 um 10:00 schrieb Jarno Huuskonen: Hi, On Wed, Jun 21, Daniel Heitepriem wrote: we got a problem recently which we can't explain to ourself. We got a java application (Tomcat WAR-File) which has to handle several million of requests per

HAProxy makes backend unresponsive when handling multiple thousand connections per second

2017-06-21 Thread Daniel Heitepriem
Hi everyone, we got a problem recently which we can't explain to ourself. We got a java application (Tomcat WAR-File) which has to handle several million of requests per day and several thousand requests per second during peak times. Due to this high amount we are splitting traffic using an

Re: HAProxy makes backend unresponsive when handling multiple thousand connections per second

2017-06-21 Thread Daniel Heitepriem
Am 21.06.17 um 11:37 schrieb Igor Cicimov: On 21 Jun 2017 6:34 pm, "Daniel Heitepriem" <daniel.heitepr...@pribas.com <mailto:daniel.heitepr...@pribas.com>> wrote: Nothing special. No errors, no dropped connections just an increased server response time (Tr). An e

Re: HAProxy makes backend unresponsive when handling multiple thousand connections per second

2017-06-22 Thread Daniel Heitepriem
Hi everyone, thanks for your suggestions. Let me go through them step by step: Actually, I would have suggested the opposite: making the whole thing less expensive, by going full blown keep-alive with http-reuse: option http-keep-alive option prefer-last-server timeout

Re: HAProxy 1.7.5 forwards requests blockwise

2017-05-02 Thread Daniel Heitepriem
Hi Willy, thank you very much for your detailed response. I will try out your suggestions and get back to the mailing list if I got any problems. Regards. Daniel Am 28.04.17 um 19:08 schrieb Willy Tarreau: Hi Daniel, On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 06:58:38PM +0200, Daniel Heitepriem wrote: Hi

Re: Will HAProxy community supports mailers section?

2017-08-24 Thread Daniel Heitepriem
email-alert from redm...@netrovert.net <mailto:redm...@netrovert.net> > email-alert to rajesh.ko...@netrovert.net > <mailto:rajesh.ko...@netrovert.net> > server 11-80-R7-CLST-Node110.10.11.80:80 > <http://10.10.11.80:80> check > s

Re: Will HAProxy community supports mailers section?

2017-08-24 Thread Daniel Heitepriem
Hi Rajesh, the community version supports mailers. Here is a working section from my configuration: mailers mymailserver mailer smtp1 10.1.0.251:25 frontend frontend_CHANGEME bind *:443 ssl crt /opt/etc/haproxy/haproxy-t.pem force-tlsv12 no-sslv3

Error ‘NAME_MAX’ undeclared in HAProxy 1.8 on Solaris 11.3 (64-bit)

2017-11-03 Thread Daniel Heitepriem
Hi everyone, I tried to compile the recent HAProxy 1.8 (pulled from the git repository) on Solaris 11.3 (x86) with these settings: gmake TARGET=solaris CPU=generic USE_TPROXY=1 USE_ZLIB=1 USE_OPENSSL=1 USE_PCRE=1 USE_GETADDRINFO=1 USE_REGPARM=1 DEFINE="-D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600" "-D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600"

Re: Error 'NAME_MAX' undeclared in HAProxy 1.8 on Solaris 11.3 (64-bit)

2017-11-03 Thread Daniel Heitepriem
Hi Willy, when including "DEFINE="-DNAME_MAX=MAXPATHLEN"" in the build statement, HAProxy compiles fine (leaving the warning aside). ./haproxy -vv HA-Proxy version 1.8-rc1 2017/10/31 Copyright 2000-2017 Willy Tarreau Build options :   TARGET  = solaris