/127\.0\.0\.1\:1344\/respmod\
ICAP\/1\.0\r\n\
tcp-check send \r\n
tcp-check expect string ICAP\/1\.0\ 200\ OK
but it is still not working, I suspect I need to use some type of regex or
such. Hoping somebody can help me along with this.
TIA..
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 7:42 AM, Daren Se
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Igor Cicimov <
ig...@encompasscorporation.com> wrote:
>
> On 31/10/2015 3:14 AM, "Daren Sefcik" <dsef...@hightechhigh.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 11:15 PM, Igor Cicimov <
> ig..
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 11:15 PM, Igor Cicimov <
ig...@encompasscorporation.com> wrote:
>
> On 30/10/2015 4:48 PM, "Daren Sefcik" <dsef...@hightechhigh.org> wrote:
> >
> > So I think those links were the right idea and I have been trying
> different c
com> wrote:
> Hi Daren,
>
> What type of errors are reported?
>
> Baptiste
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Daren Sefcik <dsef...@hightechhigh.org>
> wrote:
> > I followed Willy's advice from this post
> >
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/hapr
I am thinking the answer is no but figured I would ask just to make
sure...basically can I change individual server maxconn numbers on-the-fly
while haproxy is running or do I need to do a full restart to have them
take effect?
TIA...
I have an ICAP server backend with servers that each listen on different
ports, can anyone offer some advice on how to configure health checks for
it? I am currently using basic but that really doesn't help if the service
is not responding.
Here is my haproxy config for the backend:
backend
Thanks Jarno, I am still not sure how I can apply this to each server using
a different port but will poke around at it and see if I can figure it out.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Jarno Huuskonen <jarno.huusko...@uef.fi>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Oct 18, Daren Sefcik wr
Using HATop I see lots of ERSP errors which I guess is response
errors...not sure if that is helpful.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Daren Sefcik <dsef...@hightechhigh.org>
wrote:
> The only thing I can look at is the stats page which report failed health
> checks. I have tried
I followed Willy's advice from this post
http://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg05171.html
but seem to get a lot of health check errors and (false) Dwntme. Is there a
newer or better way to do health checks or am I missing something?
TIA..
BTW, nice work on 1.6, am looking forward
How about kern.ipc.somaxconn
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 5:22 AM, Dmitry Sivachenko
wrote:
>
> > On 8 окт. 2015 г., at 3:51, Igor Cicimov
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > The only thing I can think of is you have left net.core.somaxconn = 128,
> try
Thanks, this will be helpful to find a good load balance as the systems are
running.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 02:19:52PM -0500, Andrew Hayworth wrote:
> > I was just thinking about how useful this would be, and will submit a
>
n Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Daren Sefcik <dsef...@hightechhigh.org>
> wrote:
> > I am probably totally overlooking something but how do I configure a
> > frontend/backend to pass to the same server for both SSL and Non SSL
> > requests? We have server that require ssl for some applications but
> most of
> > the time not.
> >
>
Can anyone point me to any references that explain optimal squid/web cache
specific examples of configuring haproxy? Everything I am finding so far
seems specific to web servers being the backend. Things like should I be
using stick tables or cookies or best client time out, etc
TIA
I am probably totally overlooking something but how do I configure a
frontend/backend to pass to the same server for both SSL and Non SSL
requests? We have server that require ssl for some applications but most
of the time not.
, joris dedieu <joris.ded...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2015-10-04 23:33 GMT+02:00 Daren Sefcik <dsef...@hightechhigh.org>:
> > I am trying to make some requests go to specific backends but am finding
> > that in certain backends that the url gets doubled
d bkapp
>
> backend bkapp
> mode tcp
> stick-table type ip size 10k peers mypeers
> stick on src
> server s1 a.b.c.d check port 80
> server s2 a.b.c.e check port 80
>
>
> Baptiste
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Daren Sefcik <dsef...@hightechhigh.or
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 7:30 AM, joris dedieu wrote:
> Broadcom NICs : you should check man 4 bge and
> https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Tuning_and_Troubleshooting_Network_Cards
>
While I had already looked at this early in my troubleshooting process I
totally screwed it
>
>
> Interesting, so maybe in fact you're running on cards with an old horrible
> firmware like what I described in the previous e-mail.
>
Possible I suppose but these are brand new Dell systems, just got them a
few a weeks ago. Any advice on how to check and I will do so.
> Maybe your client
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> I don't know how you can do on FreeBSD. On Linux you check with ethtool -i.
> The worst versions of the chips reported firmware 1.9.6, though several
> more recent ones still had problems but not *that* important.
>
Does this
I am trying to make some requests go to specific backends but am finding
that in certain backends that the url gets doubled up or otherwise mangled,
ie:
request to frontend = http://my.company.com
what the backend server ends up with = http://my.company.comhttp://
my.company.com
This does not
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 12:09 AM, joris dedieu
wrote:
> > Running tasks: 1/2252; idle = 85 %
>
> How is the system during stress ?
>
mostly idle according to top, haproxy stats and other utils in the web gui.
here is what top reports during some of the apache bench tests:
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Daren Sefcik <dsef...@hightechhigh.org>
> wrote:
>
>> I Hope this is the right place to ask for help..if not please flame me
>> and send me on my way
>>
>> So I had haproxy 1.5 installed (as a front end for a cluster
So after making the changes (somewhat implied by Cyril) I ran apache bench
with 2 concurrent instances of "-n 1 -c 500 -w -k" and the result on
haproxy stats page is:
pid = 18093 (process #1, nbproc = 1)
uptime = 0d 2h55m08s
system limits: memmax = unlimited; ulimit-n = 100043
maxsock =
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 5:29 AM, Travis Fitch wrote:
> My issue is, if I bypass the hardware LB, I see the X-Forwarded-For
> header, if I go via the the Hardware LB to haproxy and onto Apache, I don't
> see any x-forwarded-for headers in Apaches log files.
I am new to
On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Igor Cicimov <ig...@encompasscorporation.com
> wrote:
>
>
> On 29 Jun 2017 2:46 am, "Daren Sefcik" <dsef...@hightechhigh.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Olivier Doucet <webmas...@ajeux.com>
> wrote
On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Igor Cicimov <ig...@encompasscorporation.com
> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Daren Sefcik <dsef...@hightechhigh.org>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Michael Ezzell <mich...@ezzell.net>
On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 7:30 PM, Michael Ezzell <mich...@ezzell.net> wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 2, 2017 8:41 PM, "Daren Sefcik" <dsef...@hightechhigh.org> wrote:
>
> yep, pretty much..I just need some help to figure out how to make it
> work
>
> example l
Would anybody here on the list be able to offer some pointers too how I can
make this work?
TIA...
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Daren Sefcik <dsef...@hightechhigh.org>
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Olivier Doucet <webmas...@ajeux.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi
Hi, I have searched for an answer to this and tried several things but
cannot seem to figure it out so am hoping someone can point me in the right
direction. I have different backend proxy servers (squid) setup to handle
specifically HTTP and HTTPS traffic but cannot figure out how to tell
haproxy
We use PfSense with CARP & HaProxy, works great.
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 1:34 AM, Jiafan Zhou
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Haproxy ensures the HA for real servers such as httpd. However, in the
> case of haproxy itself, if it fails, then it requires another instance of
> haproxy to
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Olivier Doucet <webmas...@ajeux.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> 2017-06-28 16:47 GMT+02:00 Daren Sefcik <dsef...@hightechhigh.org>:
>
>> Hi, I have searched for an answer to this and tried several things but
>> cannot seem to figur
31 matches
Mail list logo