lt to 3) and
"rise" (default to 2).
It takes up to 50 seconds to converge the server, as far as the haproxy
is concerned.
Is that correct to say?
Kindly inform of anything wrong or incorrect here.
Regards,
Jiafan
On 05/15/2017 09:10 PM, Bryan Talbot wrote:
On May 13, 2017, at May
Hi all,
The version of haproxy I use is:
# haproxy -version
HA-Proxy version 1.5.2 2014/07/12
Copyright 2000-2014 Willy Tarreau
I have a question regarding the Health Check. In the documentation of
haproxy, it mentions the below for the "timeout check" and "inter":
For
Hi all,
The version of haproxy I use is:
# haproxy -version
HA-Proxy version 1.5.2 2014/07/12
Copyright 2000-2014 Willy Tarreau
I have a question regarding the Health Check. In the documentation of
haproxy, it mentions the below for the "timeout check" and "inter":
For
Hi,
Haproxy ensures the HA for real servers such as httpd. However, in the
case of haproxy itself, if it fails, then it requires another instance
of haproxy to be ready. Is there any High Availability solution for
haproxy itself?
Regards,
Jiafan
m
Vincent Bernat here:
https://vincent.bernat.im/en/blog/2013-exabgp-highavailability
HTH,
Raph
Le 2017-06-02 10:34, Jiafan Zhou a écrit :
Hi,
Haproxy ensures the HA for real servers such as httpd. However, in the
case of haproxy itself, if it fails, then it requires another instance
of hap
5 matches
Mail list logo