Hello Willy,
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 04:46:43PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> To be honest, I'm quite embarrassed by such a change. I think the main
> reason for the initial warning instead of error was that most people
> using haproxy in unprivileged environments never knew what to use as
> a
Hi William,
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 11:14:20AM +0200, William Dauchy wrote:
> On a production environment with a given maxconn, the fd limit can be
> successfully set at a given time. While raising maxconn, a new max fd
> limit is calculated. If the setrlimit fails (e.g if sysctl fs.nr_open
> is
On a production environment with a given maxconn, the fd limit can be
successfully set at a given time. While raising maxconn, a new max fd
limit is calculated. If the setrlimit fails (e.g if sysctl fs.nr_open
is lower), we silently revert to the max obtained through getrlimit,
which can be way
3 matches
Mail list logo
