On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 02:33:05PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> > So in my opinion we should only emit "Vary: accept-encoding" when
> > adding Content-Encoding. Am I missing something ?
>
> I believe you are correct that only sending the 'Vary' when actually
> compressing is fine according to
Willy,
Am 17.06.19 um 14:17 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Hi Tim,
>
> I'm back to this one :
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 10:36:51PM +0200, Tim Duesterhus wrote:
>> This thread contains two "competing" patches to fix the BUG that HAProxy
>> does not set the `Vary` response header when the compression
Hi Tim,
I'm back to this one :
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 10:36:51PM +0200, Tim Duesterhus wrote:
> This thread contains two "competing" patches to fix the BUG that HAProxy
> does not set the `Vary` response header when the compression filter is
> applied. When not setting the `Vary` header the
Willy,
Am 13.06.19 um 17:26 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 10:36:51PM +0200, Tim Duesterhus wrote:
>> Willy,
>>
>> First things first:
>>
>> Yes, I'm aware that this is shortly before 2.0. Either put this into 2.0
>> or put this into `next` if you consider it too risky (or just
Hi Tim,
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 10:36:51PM +0200, Tim Duesterhus wrote:
> Willy,
>
> First things first:
>
> Yes, I'm aware that this is shortly before 2.0. Either put this into 2.0
> or put this into `next` if you consider it too risky (or just wait until
> 2.0 release before merging).
I had
Willy,
First things first:
Yes, I'm aware that this is shortly before 2.0. Either put this into 2.0
or put this into `next` if you consider it too risky (or just wait until
2.0 release before merging).
Also *add backporting instructions*, please. I recommend to backport it to
2.0 at the least.
6 matches
Mail list logo
