On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 09:36:56AM +, William Dauchy wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 06:57:44AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Here are the adjustments I'm proposing (only 2 and 3 were slightly
> > touched). I'm not committing them without your consent since they
> > were signed-off :-) Just
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 06:57:44AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Here are the adjustments I'm proposing (only 2 and 3 were slightly
> touched). I'm not committing them without your consent since they
> were signed-off :-) Just let me know.
:-)
the new diff looks good to me
Thanks,
--
William
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 06:40:23AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> I'm taking the patchset. However I'll apply some small changes :
>
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 08:08:10PM +0100, William Dauchy wrote:
> > in global config parsing, we currently expect to have a possible no
> > keyword (KWN_NO), but we
Here are the adjustments I'm proposing (only 2 and 3 were slightly
touched). I'm not committing them without your consent since they
were signed-off :-) Just let me know.
Thanks,
Willy
>From 7f36164b38965c4c8a8df8d5aadbc31cafd39986 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: William Dauchy
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2
Hi William,
I'm taking the patchset. However I'll apply some small changes :
On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 08:08:10PM +0100, William Dauchy wrote:
> in global config parsing, we currently expect to have a possible no
> keyword (KWN_NO), but we never allow it in config parsing.
> another patch could hav
in global config parsing, we currently expect to have a possible no
keyword (KWN_NO), but we never allow it in config parsing.
another patch could have been to simply remove the code handling a
possible KWN_NO.
take this opportunity to update documentation of set-dumpable.
also make all strcmp cond
6 matches
Mail list logo