Re: HTTP/3 | daniel.haxx.se

2018-11-12 Thread Aleksandar Lazic
Am 12.11.2018 um 23:31 schrieb Willy Tarreau: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 10:52:41PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: >> Oh wow this is really a good time to get the hands dirty as QUIC is a major >> design change in HTTP, IMHO. > > Some first approaches were already attempted about one year ago

Re: HTTP/3 | daniel.haxx.se

2018-11-12 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 10:52:41PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: > Oh wow this is really a good time to get the hands dirty as QUIC is a major > design change in HTTP, IMHO. Some first approaches were already attempted about one year ago already, to avoid being later in the party. But just like

Re: HTTP/3 | daniel.haxx.se

2018-11-12 Thread Aleksandar Lazic
Hi Willy. Am 12.11.2018 um 21:01 schrieb Willy Tarreau: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 07:42:21PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: >> Even I agree with you to the point that HAProxy should be able to handle this >> next upcomming/available technology, I'm not sure if it's really a benefit >> for us, the

Re: HTTP/3 | daniel.haxx.se

2018-11-12 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 07:42:21PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: > Even I agree with you to the point that HAProxy should be able to handle this > next upcomming/available technology, I'm not sure if it's really a benefit > for us, the enduser. Hey, why do you guys imagine we're suffering that

Re: HTTP/3 | daniel.haxx.se

2018-11-12 Thread Aleksandar Lazic
it further off the list, if you like. Regads aleks Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Emmanuel Hocdet Gesendet: 12. November 2018 18:44:40 MEZ An: Aleksandar Lazic CC: haproxy@formilux.org Betreff: Re: HTTP/3 | daniel.haxx.se Hi Aleks, > Le 12 nov. 2018 à 18:02, Aleksandar La

Re: HTTP/3 | daniel.haxx.se

2018-11-12 Thread Emmanuel Hocdet
Hi Aleks, > Le 12 nov. 2018 à 18:02, Aleksandar Lazic a écrit : > > Hi Manu. > > Am 12.11.2018 um 16:19 schrieb Emmanuel Hocdet: >> >> Hi, >> >> The primary (major) step should be to deal with QUIC transport (over UDP). >> At the same level as TCP for haproxy? >> Willy should already have a

Re: HTTP/3 | daniel.haxx.se

2018-11-12 Thread Aleksandar Lazic
Hi Manu. Am 12.11.2018 um 16:19 schrieb Emmanuel Hocdet: > > Hi, > > The primary (major) step should be to deal with QUIC transport (over UDP). > At the same level as TCP for haproxy? > Willy should already have a little idea on it ;-) Is then the conclusion for that that haproxy will be able

Re: HTTP/3 | daniel.haxx.se

2018-11-12 Thread Emmanuel Hocdet
Hi, The primary (major) step should be to deal with QUIC transport (over UDP). At the same level as TCP for haproxy? Willy should already have a little idea on it ;-) ++ Manu > Le 11 nov. 2018 à 20:38, Aleksandar Lazic a écrit : > > Hi. > > FYI. > > Oh no, that was quite fast after HTTP/2

HTTP/3 | daniel.haxx.se

2018-11-11 Thread Aleksandar Lazic
Hi. FYI. Oh no, that was quite fast after HTTP/2 https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2018/11/11/http-3/ Regards Aleks