Am 12.11.2018 um 23:31 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 10:52:41PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>> Oh wow this is really a good time to get the hands dirty as QUIC is a major
>> design change in HTTP, IMHO.
>
> Some first approaches were already attempted about one year ago
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 10:52:41PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> Oh wow this is really a good time to get the hands dirty as QUIC is a major
> design change in HTTP, IMHO.
Some first approaches were already attempted about one year ago already,
to avoid being later in the party. But just like
Hi Willy.
Am 12.11.2018 um 21:01 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 07:42:21PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>> Even I agree with you to the point that HAProxy should be able to handle this
>> next upcomming/available technology, I'm not sure if it's really a benefit
>> for us, the
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 07:42:21PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> Even I agree with you to the point that HAProxy should be able to handle this
> next upcomming/available technology, I'm not sure if it's really a benefit
> for us, the enduser.
Hey, why do you guys imagine we're suffering that
it further off the list, if you like.
Regads aleks
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Emmanuel Hocdet
Gesendet: 12. November 2018 18:44:40 MEZ
An: Aleksandar Lazic
CC: haproxy@formilux.org
Betreff: Re: HTTP/3 | daniel.haxx.se
Hi Aleks,
> Le 12 nov. 2018 à 18:02, Aleksandar La
Hi Aleks,
> Le 12 nov. 2018 à 18:02, Aleksandar Lazic a écrit :
>
> Hi Manu.
>
> Am 12.11.2018 um 16:19 schrieb Emmanuel Hocdet:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The primary (major) step should be to deal with QUIC transport (over UDP).
>> At the same level as TCP for haproxy?
>> Willy should already have a
Hi Manu.
Am 12.11.2018 um 16:19 schrieb Emmanuel Hocdet:
>
> Hi,
>
> The primary (major) step should be to deal with QUIC transport (over UDP).
> At the same level as TCP for haproxy?
> Willy should already have a little idea on it ;-)
Is then the conclusion for that that haproxy will be able
Hi,
The primary (major) step should be to deal with QUIC transport (over UDP).
At the same level as TCP for haproxy?
Willy should already have a little idea on it ;-)
++
Manu
> Le 11 nov. 2018 à 20:38, Aleksandar Lazic a écrit :
>
> Hi.
>
> FYI.
>
> Oh no, that was quite fast after HTTP/2
Hi.
FYI.
Oh no, that was quite fast after HTTP/2
https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2018/11/11/http-3/
Regards
Aleks
9 matches
Mail list logo