Awesome, thanks!
On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 at 14:19, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 02:10:15PM +0100, David King wrote:
> > Fantastic, thanks everyone
> >
> > i guess i would need to wait to 1.8.14 for seeing it on stable?
>
> In fact we'll backport it ASAP along with a few possibly ot
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 02:10:15PM +0100, David King wrote:
> Fantastic, thanks everyone
>
> i guess i would need to wait to 1.8.14 for seeing it on stable?
In fact we'll backport it ASAP along with a few possibly other pending
patches. We take care of maintaining the ordering between the patches
Fantastic, thanks everyone
i guess i would need to wait to 1.8.14 for seeing it on stable?
On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 at 13:53, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Olivier,
>
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 02:51:57PM +0200, Olivier Houchard wrote:
> > Ok I think I figured it out.
> > The bug was present in master to
Hi Olivier,
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 02:51:57PM +0200, Olivier Houchard wrote:
> Ok I think I figured it out.
> The bug was present in master too, but was masked for some reason.
>
> The patches attached should fix this. The first one is for master, and the
> second one for 1.8, as the master patc
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 12:58:40PM +0100, David King wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I just tested, and it seems to happen with the latest 1.8, but not with
> 1.9.
> > Not using kqueue (by using -dk) seems to work around the issue.
> > It's quite interesting it doesn't happen on Centos, it means it is
> p
Hi,
> I just tested, and it seems to happen with the latest 1.8, but not with
1.9.
> Not using kqueue (by using -dk) seems to work around the issue.
> It's quite interesting it doesn't happen on Centos, it means it is
probably
> kqueue-specific (or that it works by accident with epoll/poll/select)
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 12:36:08PM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 at 11:55, David King wrote:
> >
> > Apologies, i forgot to mention this is running on FreeBSD 11.1
> >
> > I've just run the same tests on Centos and there is no issue
>
> Could you retry with the current dev
On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 at 11:55, David King wrote:
>
> Apologies, i forgot to mention this is running on FreeBSD 11.1
>
> I've just run the same tests on Centos and there is no issue
Could you retry with the current development tree (1.9) from git?
There are a number of fixes waiting to be backporte
Apologies, i forgot to mention this is running on FreeBSD 11.1
I've just run the same tests on Centos and there is no issue
On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 at 09:05, David King
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> i was hoping for some help with see if this is a bug or a mis config
>
> i have a config which works fine in 1
Hi all
i was hoping for some help with see if this is a bug or a mis config
i have a config which works fine in 1.7.9 and 1.7.11, but when running it
1.8.13 is seems to fail to respond to the client
I've simplified down and anonymised the config, but basically it's being
used to do A/B failiover
10 matches
Mail list logo