Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-2.0-dev7

2019-06-11 Thread Aleksandar Lazic
Am 11.06.2019 um 22:01 schrieb Willy Tarreau: > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 09:42:13PM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: >> Sorry to say that but there is no dev7 and in >> http://www.haproxy.org/download/2.0/src/devel/ >> also not. > > Ah silly me! And who forgot to run "pubish-release" in your opinion

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-2.0-dev7

2019-06-11 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 10:02:48PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > Should I file an issue (referring to this thread) to keep track of the > whole issue and possible solutions? Oh yes please! > In Travis we have a clearly defined environment, so that kind of test > should work there as well. Good

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-2.0-dev7

2019-06-11 Thread Tim Düsterhus
Willy, Am 11.06.19 um 21:58 schrieb Willy Tarreau: >> So clearly there is no *seamless* reload happening here which is the >> very thing the test is testing. The question is: Is the issue with the >> 'abns' socket or is the issue with the 'fd@${testme}' socket? Can >> fd-sockets be seamlessly

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-2.0-dev7

2019-06-11 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 09:42:13PM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: > Sorry to say that but there is no dev7 and in > http://www.haproxy.org/download/2.0/src/devel/ > also not. Ah silly me! And who forgot to run "pubish-release" in your opinion ? :-) It's OK now. Thanks for reporting this! Willy

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-2.0-dev7

2019-06-11 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 09:27:37PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > Reading the log I believe this might actually be a real problem within > HAProxy. Note the log lines starting at 370 in the attached file: > > line 370: The old worker starts stopping its proxies (due to having > received the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-2.0-dev7

2019-06-11 Thread Aleksandar Lazic
Am 11.06.2019 um 20:02 schrieb Willy Tarreau: > Hi, > > HAProxy 2.0-dev7 was released on 2019/06/11. It added 34 new commits > after version 2.0-dev6. [snipp] > Please find the usual URLs below : >Site index : http://www.haproxy.org/ >Discourse:

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-2.0-dev7

2019-06-11 Thread Tim Düsterhus
Willy, Am 11.06.19 um 20:53 schrieb Willy Tarreau: > Hi Tim, > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 08:14:41PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote: >> Willy, >> >> Am 11.06.19 um 20:02 schrieb Willy Tarreau: >>> I noticed that no regtest failed on Travis since commit 7b3a79f6 which >> >> The abns_socket.vtc one is

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-2.0-dev7

2019-06-11 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Tim, On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 08:14:41PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > Willy, > > Am 11.06.19 um 20:02 schrieb Willy Tarreau: > > I noticed that no regtest failed on Travis since commit 7b3a79f6 which > > The abns_socket.vtc one is incredibly flaky though. I've noticed two > "failed" tests

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-2.0-dev7

2019-06-11 Thread Tim Düsterhus
Willy, Am 11.06.19 um 20:02 schrieb Willy Tarreau: > I noticed that no regtest failed on Travis since commit 7b3a79f6 which The abns_socket.vtc one is incredibly flaky though. I've noticed two "failed" tests for Travis in in the list of commits today where a single configuration failed to