Am 11.06.2019 um 22:01 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 09:42:13PM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>> Sorry to say that but there is no dev7 and in
>> http://www.haproxy.org/download/2.0/src/devel/
>> also not.
>
> Ah silly me! And who forgot to run "pubish-release" in your opinion
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 10:02:48PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Should I file an issue (referring to this thread) to keep track of the
> whole issue and possible solutions?
Oh yes please!
> In Travis we have a clearly defined environment, so that kind of test
> should work there as well.
Good
Willy,
Am 11.06.19 um 21:58 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
>> So clearly there is no *seamless* reload happening here which is the
>> very thing the test is testing. The question is: Is the issue with the
>> 'abns' socket or is the issue with the 'fd@${testme}' socket? Can
>> fd-sockets be seamlessly
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 09:42:13PM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> Sorry to say that but there is no dev7 and in
> http://www.haproxy.org/download/2.0/src/devel/
> also not.
Ah silly me! And who forgot to run "pubish-release" in your opinion ? :-)
It's OK now. Thanks for reporting this!
Willy
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 09:27:37PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Reading the log I believe this might actually be a real problem within
> HAProxy. Note the log lines starting at 370 in the attached file:
>
> line 370: The old worker starts stopping its proxies (due to having
> received the
Am 11.06.2019 um 20:02 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Hi,
>
> HAProxy 2.0-dev7 was released on 2019/06/11. It added 34 new commits
> after version 2.0-dev6.
[snipp]
> Please find the usual URLs below :
>Site index : http://www.haproxy.org/
>Discourse:
Willy,
Am 11.06.19 um 20:53 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Hi Tim,
>
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 08:14:41PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
>> Willy,
>>
>> Am 11.06.19 um 20:02 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
>>> I noticed that no regtest failed on Travis since commit 7b3a79f6 which
>>
>> The abns_socket.vtc one is
Hi Tim,
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 08:14:41PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Willy,
>
> Am 11.06.19 um 20:02 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> > I noticed that no regtest failed on Travis since commit 7b3a79f6 which
>
> The abns_socket.vtc one is incredibly flaky though. I've noticed two
> "failed" tests
Willy,
Am 11.06.19 um 20:02 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> I noticed that no regtest failed on Travis since commit 7b3a79f6 which
The abns_socket.vtc one is incredibly flaky though. I've noticed two
"failed" tests for Travis in in the list of commits today where a single
configuration failed to
9 matches
Mail list logo