пн, 7 июн. 2021 г. в 18:50, William Lallemand :
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 02:17:24PM +0200, William Lallemand wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 02:09:33PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> > >
> > > William,
> > >
> > > On 6/7/21 1:30 PM, William Lallemand wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at
On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 02:17:24PM +0200, William Lallemand wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 02:09:33PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> >
> > William,
> >
> > On 6/7/21 1:30 PM, William Lallemand wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 04:02:00PM +0500, Илья Шипицин wrote:
> > >> sorry, I do not
On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 02:09:33PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] CI: enable openssl-3.0.0 builds
>
> William,
>
> On 6/7/21 1:30 PM, William Lallemand wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 04:02:00PM +0500, Илья Шипицин wrote:
> >> sorry,
On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 05:08:32PM +0500, Илья Шипицин wrote:
> пн, 7 июн. 2021 г. в 16:31, William Lallemand :
>
> > On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 04:02:00PM +0500, Илья Шипицин wrote:
> > > sorry, I do not have much spare time to implement that in short time
> > > perspective.
> > > I think of 2-3
William,
On 6/7/21 1:30 PM, William Lallemand wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 04:02:00PM +0500, Илья Шипицин wrote:
sorry, I do not have much spare time to implement that in short time
perspective.
I think of 2-3 month timeframe.
Isn't it possible to pass a make argument for one specific CI
пн, 7 июн. 2021 г. в 16:31, William Lallemand :
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 04:02:00PM +0500, Илья Шипицин wrote:
> > sorry, I do not have much spare time to implement that in short time
> > perspective.
> > I think of 2-3 month timeframe.
> >
>
> Isn't it possible to pass a make argument for one
On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 04:02:00PM +0500, Илья Шипицин wrote:
> sorry, I do not have much spare time to implement that in short time
> perspective.
> I think of 2-3 month timeframe.
>
Isn't it possible to pass a make argument for one specific CI job?
This way we could just do something like:
On Sun, Jun 06, 2021 at 05:36:45AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 06, 2021 at 12:51:53AM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> > Ilya,
> >
> > On 6/5/21 5:10 AM, ??? wrote:
> > > here are two patches:
> > >
> > > - deprecated warnings suppressed
> > > - openssl-3.0.0 enabled
> > >
>
On Sun, Jun 06, 2021 at 12:51:53AM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Ilya,
>
> On 6/5/21 5:10 AM, ??? wrote:
> > here are two patches:
> >
> > - deprecated warnings suppressed
> > - openssl-3.0.0 enabled
> >
>
> In the second patch you forgot the 'CI:' prefix in the commit message.
>
>
Ilya,
On 6/5/21 5:10 AM, Илья Шипицин wrote:
here are two patches:
- deprecated warnings suppressed
- openssl-3.0.0 enabled
In the second patch you forgot the 'CI:' prefix in the commit message.
Other than that the patches LGTM with regard to the CI changes.
Best regards
Tim Düsterhus
here are two patches:
- deprecated warnings suppressed
- openssl-3.0.0 enabled
ср, 2 июн. 2021 г. в 21:51, Tim Düsterhus :
> Dinko,
>
> On 6/2/21 1:34 PM, Dinko Korunic wrote:
> > Yes, GItHub Actions has support for flagging some of the jobs in matrix
> as experimental (which will permit job to
Dinko,
On 6/2/21 1:34 PM, Dinko Korunic wrote:
Yes, GItHub Actions has support for flagging some of the jobs in matrix as
experimental (which will permit job to fail and other jobs in the matrix will
continue to execute), for instance:
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 04:34:16PM +0500, Илья Шипицин wrote:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] CI: enable openssl-3.0.0 builds
>
> ср, 2 июн. 2021 г. в 16:27, Tim Düsterhus :
>
> > Ilya,
> >
> > On 6/2/21 12:58 PM, Илья Шипицин wrote:
> > > as openssl-3.0.0
On 02.06.2021., at 13:27, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
>
> Ilya,
>
> On 6/2/21 12:58 PM, Илья Шипицин wrote:
>> as openssl-3.0.0 is getting close to release, let us add it to build matrix.
>
> I dislike that this is going to report all commits in red, until the build
> failures with OpenSSL 3 are
ср, 2 июн. 2021 г. в 16:27, Tim Düsterhus :
> Ilya,
>
> On 6/2/21 12:58 PM, Илья Шипицин wrote:
> > as openssl-3.0.0 is getting close to release, let us add it to build
> matrix.
> >
>
> I dislike that this is going to report all commits in red, until the
> build failures with OpenSSL 3 are
Ilya,
On 6/2/21 12:58 PM, Илья Шипицин wrote:
as openssl-3.0.0 is getting close to release, let us add it to build matrix.
I dislike that this is going to report all commits in red, until the
build failures with OpenSSL 3 are fixed. I did a quick research, whether
some job could be marked
16 matches
Mail list logo
