the session through socket command?
/E
From: Vivek Malik [mailto:vivek.ma...@gmail.com]
Sent: den 7 november 2011 11:05
To: Erik Torlen
Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re: Autoscaling in haproxy with persistence sessions
I personally find it easier to use cookie instead of appsession. We use a
similar
?
/E
From: Erik Torlen [mailto:erik.tor...@apicasystem.com]
Sent: den 7 november 2011 11:16
To: Vivek Malik
Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: RE: Autoscaling in haproxy with persistence sessions
Interesting. In this case we are expecting a lot of burst traffic during a very
short period of time, 15
Torlenerik.tor...@apicasystem.com
Cc: Vivek Malikvivek.ma...@gmail.com;
haproxy@formilux.orghaproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re: Autoscaling in haproxy with persistence sessions
This sounds like what balancing on a hashed value is intended for.
'hash-type consistent' will reduce the redistribution of keys when
[mailto:david.birds...@gmail.com]
Sent: den 7 november 2011 12:18
To: Erik Torlen
Cc: Vivek Malik; haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re: Autoscaling in haproxy with persistence sessions
This sounds like what balancing on a hashed value is intended for.
'hash-type consistent' will reduce the redistribution of keys
-
From: vivek.ma...@gmail.com [mailto:vivek.ma...@gmail.com]
Sent: den 7 november 2011 12:27
To: David Birdsong; Erik Torlen
Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re: Autoscaling in haproxy with persistence sessions
If the solution is intended for traffic burst, Isn't it safe to assume that
most
On 2011-11-07 21:32, Erik Torlen wrote:
If you get a burst against 3 active backend servers they will take
care of all the request and connections. The clients that are active
will then get a persistence sessions against 1 of these 3 servers. It
will take ~5min to scale up a new server so
:43
To: Erik Torlen
Cc: vivek.ma...@gmail.com; David Birdsong; haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re: Autoscaling in haproxy with persistence sessions
Hi Erik,
Let me give you a few information, I don't know if it will help.
Appsession is not resilient on HAProxy reload.
Which means that since you reload
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Erik Torlen erik.tor...@apicasystem.com wrote:
Thank you Baptiste, seems like it should work then out-of-the-box when using
appsession.
On Haproxy reload the sessions should be cleared and then clients would be
replicated to new servers.
Actually, the
-Original Message-
From: vivek.ma...@gmail.com [mailto:vivek.ma...@gmail.com]
Sent: den 7 november 2011 12:27
To: David Birdsong; Erik Torlen
Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re: Autoscaling in haproxy with persistence sessions
If the solution is intended for traffic burst, Isn't it safe
mainstream tends to
generate traffic so we need to make sure that
scaling further up will work as expected.
/E
-Original Message-
From: Holger Just [mailto:hapr...@meine-er.de]
Sent: den 7 november 2011 12:45
To: haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re: Autoscaling in haproxy with persistence sessions
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Erik Torlen
erik.tor...@apicasystem.com wrote:
What would you recommend if we wanted to have all our three haproxy instances
loadbalance in the same way.
And still make use of persistence when the client is using one of the haproxy
instances?
E.g Having the
-Original Message-
From: Baptiste [mailto:bed...@gmail.com]
Sent: den 7 november 2011 13:58
To: Erik Torlen
Cc: vivek.ma...@gmail.com; David Birdsong; haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re: Autoscaling in haproxy with persistence sessions
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Erik Torlen
erik.tor
12 matches
Mail list logo
