Re: Performance optimization on VMWare VM's

2012-05-02 Thread Sebastian Fohler

Hi,

How important is it to assign a specific NIC to the single haproxy vm 
with physical passthrough?


Best regards
Sebastian

On 16.04.2012 07:01, Baptiste wrote:

Hey,

You have to reserve resources for the VM.
FYI, At exceliance, we were able to go up to 55K rps in a VM on a core i7.

You'll need to tune your sysctl as well.

cheers

On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Willy Tarreauw...@1wt.eu  wrote:

On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 05:35:59PM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote:

Does that mean Sandy/Ivy Bridge based Intel Platforms can't be undoubtedly
recommended for high performance usage with haproxy or is there a workaround?

It's never all white or black. It also depends on the L3 cache latency. My
experience with first gen i5 CPUs is quite good and much better than with
the 12-core AMD 6172.


What platform would you recommend for a new setup?

i3/i5 are really good performers. Pick one with a high frequency and you
should be fine.

Regards,
Willy







Re: Performance optimization on VMWare VM's

2012-05-02 Thread Baptiste
Hey,

If you really need to do that for performance purpose, then you should
dedicate a server to your LB...

cheers

On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Sebastian Fohler i...@far-galaxy.de wrote:
 Hi,

 How important is it to assign a specific NIC to the single haproxy vm with
 physical passthrough?

 Best regards
 Sebastian


 On 16.04.2012 07:01, Baptiste wrote:

 Hey,

 You have to reserve resources for the VM.
 FYI, At exceliance, we were able to go up to 55K rps in a VM on a core i7.

 You'll need to tune your sysctl as well.

 cheers

 On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Willy Tarreauw...@1wt.eu  wrote:

 On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 05:35:59PM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote:

 Does that mean Sandy/Ivy Bridge based Intel Platforms can't be
 undoubtedly
 recommended for high performance usage with haproxy or is there a
 workaround?

 It's never all white or black. It also depends on the L3 cache latency.
 My
 experience with first gen i5 CPUs is quite good and much better than with
 the 12-core AMD 6172.

 What platform would you recommend for a new setup?

 i3/i5 are really good performers. Pick one with a high frequency and you
 should be fine.

 Regards,
 Willy







RE: Performance optimization on VMWare VM's

2012-04-15 Thread Lukas Tribus

Does that mean Sandy/Ivy Bridge based Intel Platforms can't be undoubtedly
recommended for high performance usage with haproxy or is there a workaround?

What platform would you recommend for a new setup?

  


Re: Performance optimization on VMWare VM's

2012-04-15 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 05:35:59PM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote:
 
 Does that mean Sandy/Ivy Bridge based Intel Platforms can't be undoubtedly
 recommended for high performance usage with haproxy or is there a workaround?

It's never all white or black. It also depends on the L3 cache latency. My
experience with first gen i5 CPUs is quite good and much better than with
the 12-core AMD 6172.

 What platform would you recommend for a new setup?

i3/i5 are really good performers. Pick one with a high frequency and you
should be fine.

Regards,
Willy




Re: Performance optimization on VMWare VM's

2012-04-15 Thread Baptiste
Hey,

You have to reserve resources for the VM.
FYI, At exceliance, we were able to go up to 55K rps in a VM on a core i7.

You'll need to tune your sysctl as well.

cheers

On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
 On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 05:35:59PM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote:

 Does that mean Sandy/Ivy Bridge based Intel Platforms can't be undoubtedly
 recommended for high performance usage with haproxy or is there a workaround?

 It's never all white or black. It also depends on the L3 cache latency. My
 experience with first gen i5 CPUs is quite good and much better than with
 the 12-core AMD 6172.

 What platform would you recommend for a new setup?

 i3/i5 are really good performers. Pick one with a high frequency and you
 should be fine.

 Regards,
 Willy