On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 03:35:30PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> I believe I already said it somewhere: The most valuable thing about
> monitor-uri is that it does not create entries within the access log. I
> don't think that can be replicated with http-request return as of now,
> but I am happy
Hi Lukas!
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:53:33AM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 15:29, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > For "nbproc", given that I had no response in the previous question and
> > I anticipate some surprises if I play games with it, I'll probably apply
> >
Hello,
On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 15:29, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> For "nbproc", given that I had no response in the previous question and
> I anticipate some surprises if I play games with it, I'll probably apply
> William's suggestion, consisting in starting to emit a warning about it,
> and asking
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 03:35:30PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Willy,
>
> Am 14.10.20 um 15:29 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> > As previously discussed above, we can probably keep monitor-uri for now
> > as it works. It's not the most elegant thing in the code but replacing
> > it will be at least as
Willy,
Am 14.10.20 um 15:29 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> As previously discussed above, we can probably keep monitor-uri for now
> as it works. It's not the most elegant thing in the code but replacing
> it will be at least as annoying for some users as it is to keep it in
> the code. Probably that
5 matches
Mail list logo
