On 2/6/2015 5:48 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Has somebody ever posted a working example configuration for haproxy
that applies the improvements mentioned in the video?
I tried to implement these recommendations but didn't seem to get
results I was expecting. How exactly does one reliably
Shawn Heisey wrote on 02/06/2015 07:38 AM:
[CUT]
The current haproxy version implements almost every
performance-enhancing method mentioned in that video, as long as your
openssl is new enough.
It's on CentOS 6.. is that new enough?
We'll start testing different scenarios and see if we find
On 06.02.2015 18:50, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 06.02.2015 14:13, Lukas Tribus wrote:
I tried to implement these recommendations but didn't seem to get
results I was expecting. How exactly does one reliably test that the
1-RTT handshake is actually working?
Enable TFO and announce
On 06.02.2015 07:38, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 2/5/2015 5:54 AM, Klavs Klavsen wrote:
Adding nbproc 4, improved performance of https from 511 req/s to 1296
req/s..
not quite an exponential scaling..
We tested with 8 cores and got 1328 req/s.. so it seems we're hitting
something else already
I tried to implement these recommendations but didn't seem to get
results I was expecting. How exactly does one reliably test that the
1-RTT handshake is actually working?
Enable TFO and announce http/1.1 via NPN and ALPN, that should
do it.
But your client will have to support all those
On 06.02.2015 14:13, Lukas Tribus wrote:
I tried to implement these recommendations but didn't seem to get
results I was expecting. How exactly does one reliably test that the
1-RTT handshake is actually working?
Enable TFO and announce http/1.1 via NPN and ALPN, that should
do it.
But
On 2/5/2015 5:54 AM, Klavs Klavsen wrote:
Adding nbproc 4, improved performance of https from 511 req/s to 1296
req/s..
not quite an exponential scaling..
We tested with 8 cores and got 1328 req/s.. so it seems we're hitting
something else already after 2,5 core..
vmstat 1 - also
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 05, Klavs Klavsen wrote:
Jarno Huuskonen wrote on 02/05/2015 01:28 PM:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 05, Klavs Klavsen wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm testing our haproxy setup in regards to SSL performance - by
simply using ab, and fetching a favicon.ico file..
over http haproxy delivers
Adding nbproc 4, improved performance of https from 511 req/s to 1296
req/s..
not quite an exponential scaling..
We tested with 8 cores and got 1328 req/s.. so it seems we're hitting
something else already after 2,5 core..
vmstat 1 - also reveals a lot of cpu-idle time..
Jarno Huuskonen
Jarno Huuskonen wrote on 02/05/2015 01:28 PM:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 05, Klavs Klavsen wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm testing our haproxy setup in regards to SSL performance - by
simply using ab, and fetching a favicon.ico file..
over http haproxy delivers 3.000 req/s.
over https haproxy delivers 511 req/s.
Baptiste wrote on 02/05/2015 04:44 PM:
[CUT]
3000 req/s in clear is low and a so rounded number is not normal :)
Move (far far) away from this provider.
You're wasting your time investigating perfomance issue while the
limitation is in the hypervisor and multitenancy of your supplier.
it's
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Jarno Huuskonen jarno.huusko...@uef.fi wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 05, Klavs Klavsen wrote:
Jarno Huuskonen wrote on 02/05/2015 01:28 PM:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 05, Klavs Klavsen wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm testing our haproxy setup in regards to SSL performance - by
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Klavs Klavsen k...@vsen.dk wrote:
Baptiste wrote on 02/05/2015 04:44 PM:
[CUT]
3000 req/s in clear is low and a so rounded number is not normal :)
Move (far far) away from this provider.
You're wasting your time investigating perfomance issue while the
On 05.02.2015 20:09, Baptiste wrote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Klavs Klavsen k...@vsen.dk wrote:
Baptiste wrote on 02/05/2015 04:44 PM:
[CUT]
3000 req/s in clear is low and a so rounded number is not normal :)
Move (far far) away from this provider.
You're wasting your time
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 05, Klavs Klavsen wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm testing our haproxy setup in regards to SSL performance - by
simply using ab, and fetching a favicon.ico file..
over http haproxy delivers 3.000 req/s.
over https haproxy delivers 511 req/s.
I tried giving haproxy more cores (it's
15 matches
Mail list logo
