Re: master-worker and seamless reload (bug)

2017-06-20 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 02:41:51PM +0200, William Lallemand wrote: > Willy, could you merge them? thanks done, thanks! willy

Re: master-worker and seamless reload (bug)

2017-06-20 Thread William Lallemand
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 03:35:08PM +0200, Emmanuel Hocdet wrote: > In case of upgrade from haproxy without -x option to -x, i suppose it will do > cleanly. > I try to play with -x, multi-proc (add and remove), upgrade pre -x without > master-worker and is painful. > Perhaps i misunderstood (and

Re: master-worker and seamless reload (bug)

2017-06-19 Thread Emmanuel Hocdet
> Le 19 juin 2017 à 15:06, William Lallemand a écrit : > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:26:31AM +0200, Emmanuel Hocdet wrote: >> >> Exactly, use case is to upgrade haproxy from a 1.6/1.7/1.8 compatibility to >> 1.8 with master worker. >> > > That's insteresting, I will

Re: master-worker and seamless reload (bug)

2017-06-19 Thread William Lallemand
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:26:31AM +0200, Emmanuel Hocdet wrote: > > Exactly, use case is to upgrade haproxy from a 1.6/1.7/1.8 compatibility to > 1.8 with master worker. > That's insteresting, I will do some tests in order to be able to do this properly. > > It's much simpler than I

Re: master-worker and seamless reload (bug)

2017-06-19 Thread Emmanuel Hocdet
> Le 16 juin 2017 à 18:49, William Lallemand a écrit : > > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 05:28:51PM +0200, Emmanuel Hocdet wrote: >> Hi, >> > > Hi Emmanuel, > Hi William >> i try to play with that, but i’m a little confused with the behaviour. >> >> In my test, i use

Re: master-worker and seamless reload (bug)

2017-06-16 Thread William Lallemand
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 05:28:51PM +0200, Emmanuel Hocdet wrote: > Hi, > Hi Emmanuel, > i try to play with that, but i’m a little confused with the behaviour. > > In my test, i use alternatly haproxy upgrade and worker reload (via USR2) > > start with upgrade: > # /usr/sbin/haproxy -f