Re: reg-tests situation in haproxy 1.8

2019-01-23 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 03:28:35PM +0100, Frederic Lecaille wrote: > On 1/19/19 8:53 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > I was interested in backporting them to 1.8 once we have more experience > > with them and they're better organized, so that we avoid backporting > > reorg patches. I'd say we've made

Re: reg-tests situation in haproxy 1.8

2019-01-21 Thread Frederic Lecaille
On 1/19/19 8:53 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote: Hi Lukas, On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 12:43:34PM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote: Hello, currently we have 4 reg-tests in haproxy-1.8, backported due to the actual bugfix commit, which included a test. We also have a broken symbolic link in

Re: reg-tests situation in haproxy 1.8

2019-01-21 Thread Frederic Lecaille
On 1/19/19 8:53 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote: Hi Lukas, On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 12:43:34PM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote: Hello, currently we have 4 reg-tests in haproxy-1.8, backported due to the actual bugfix commit, which included a test. We also have a broken symbolic link in

Re: reg-tests situation in haproxy 1.8

2019-01-18 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Lukas, On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 12:43:34PM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote: > Hello, > > > currently we have 4 reg-tests in haproxy-1.8, backported due to the > actual bugfix commit, which included a test. We also have a broken > symbolic link in reg-tests/lua/common.pem, which causes at least some