Re: s390x and HAProxy?
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 04:50:12PM +0500, ??? wrote: > ??, 13 ???. 2020 ?. ? 16:48, Aleksandar Lazic : > > > Mar 13, 2020 12:11:16 PM ??? : > > > > > initial motivation was that article > > > > > > https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/multi-cpu-architectures > > > > Thanks for the link. > > > > > travis allows to run builds on various archs, why not to test ? > > > > Full Agreeing. ;-) > > > > Would be interesting if anyone use it on Host or power. > > > > there were issues related to haproxy on openwrt. > I am not surprised if somebody runs on s390x It's very possible. You often find annoyingly rigit applications in such environments, for various legacy reasons (i.e. old application ported to linux on the same machine but rewritten in Java for example). And given that a lot of haproxy users use it as a Swiss Army Knife, it's quite understandable that some place it there to adapt the application to its legacy environment. Regarding other archs like PPC64, I've been aware of some clouds running on Power8 and using it several years ago. There was even a live deployment demo of Ubuntu on Power8 run by Mark Shuttleworth during an IBM conference showing how fast they could deploy an application on Ubuntu on this setup and they installed haproxy with the application. So it might not be as rare as one can think. Anyway the main reason for testing other archs is to stress unusual code parts (e.g. missing double-CAS but having threads etc), and detecting if we did crap on an alignment issue for example. Willy
Re: s390x and HAProxy?
пт, 13 мар. 2020 г. в 16:48, Aleksandar Lazic : > Mar 13, 2020 12:11:16 PM Илья Шипицин : > > > initial motivation was that article > > > > https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/multi-cpu-architectures > > Thanks for the link. > > > travis allows to run builds on various archs, why not to test ? > > Full Agreeing. ;-) > > Would be interesting if anyone use it on Host or power. > there were issues related to haproxy on openwrt. I am not surprised if somebody runs on s390x > > > пт, 13 мар. 2020 г. в 16:07, Aleksandar Lazic < al-hapr...@none.at >: > > > > > > > Hi. > > > > > > I'm wondering that this target is tested. > > > > http://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy.git;a=commitdiff;h=d726386421dcd184ca2518d17332f82e9cd79f2d > > > > > > Are there really user which runs HAProxy on Host? 8-O > > > How perform HAProxy on that platform? > > > > > > Regards > > > Aleks > > >
Re: s390x and HAProxy?
Mar 13, 2020 12:11:16 PM Илья Шипицин : > initial motivation was that article > > https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/multi-cpu-architectures Thanks for the link. > travis allows to run builds on various archs, why not to test ? Full Agreeing. ;-) Would be interesting if anyone use it on Host or power. > пт, 13 мар. 2020 г. в 16:07, Aleksandar Lazic < al-hapr...@none.at >: > > > > Hi. > > > > I'm wondering that this target is tested. > > http://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy.git;a=commitdiff;h=d726386421dcd184ca2518d17332f82e9cd79f2d > > > > Are there really user which runs HAProxy on Host? 8-O > > How perform HAProxy on that platform? > > > > Regards > > Aleks
Re: s390x and HAProxy?
initial motivation was that article https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/multi-cpu-architectures travis allows to run builds on various archs, why not to test ? пт, 13 мар. 2020 г. в 16:07, Aleksandar Lazic : > Hi. > > I'm wondering that this target is tested. > > http://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy.git;a=commitdiff;h=d726386421dcd184ca2518d17332f82e9cd79f2d > > Are there really user which runs HAProxy on Host? 8-O > How perform HAProxy on that platform? > > Regards > Aleks > > > >