Re: stable-bot: Bugfixes waiting for a release 2.1 (21), 2.0 (16)

2020-03-31 Thread Julien Pivotto
On 31 Mar 17:14, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 04:46:43PM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > > > Could you please cut a release ? there are many fixes that just cherry > > > picking it in my fork would make sense. > > > > I second that. I was already thinking about asking after yesterd

Re: stable-bot: Bugfixes waiting for a release 2.1 (21), 2.0 (16)

2020-03-31 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 04:46:43PM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > > Could you please cut a release ? there are many fixes that just cherry > > picking it in my fork would make sense. > > I second that. I was already thinking about asking after yesterday's > 2.2-dev5. I'm aiming at Thursday. Still

Re: stable-bot: Bugfixes waiting for a release 2.1 (21), 2.0 (16)

2020-03-24 Thread Tim Düsterhus
Julien, List, Am 24.03.20 um 16:41 schrieb Julien Pivotto: > Dear list, > > We are facing some of the bugs fixed in the 2.1 branch (in particular the > replace-path bug). There are more bugs that have not even been backported, yet. I believe some even have been "skipped" / the RNG changes have

Re: stable-bot: Bugfixes waiting for a release 2.1 (21), 2.0 (16)

2020-03-24 Thread Julien Pivotto
Dear list, We are facing some of the bugs fixed in the 2.1 branch (in particular the replace-path bug). Could you please cut a release ? there are many fixes that just cherry picking it in my fork would make sense. Thanks :) Note: the bot says that the ideal date was 2020-03-06 :) On 18 Mar 00