Hi,
Krisztian Ivancso is working on FD passing
How long will it take?
--
Regards
Dominik
-Original Message-
From: Willy Tarreau [mailto:w...@1wt.eu]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 7:46 AM
To: Mostowiec Dominik
Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re: tcp resets on reload haproxy
Hi
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 09:08:25AM +0200, Mostowiec Dominik wrote:
Hi,
Krisztian Ivancso is working on FD passing
How long will it take?
No idea, it's experimental right now so it may take some time before
it's finished and mergeable. We might also encounter complex issues
inherent to the
Hi Dominik,
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 03:52:20PM +0200, Mostowiec Dominik wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the response.
I have another problem:
11:20:58.713922 IP siege_host.46589 loadbalancer.8123: Flags [S], seq
1849604553, win 14600, options [mss 1460,nop,wscale 4], length 0
11:20:58.713951 IP
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 01:01:50AM +0100, Mariusz Gronczewski wrote:
2012/3/21 Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu:
Can I do something to fix this?
Krisztian Ivancso is working on FD passing between the old and the new
process, which should catch most of these issues. The difficulty remains
in
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 03:30:18PM +0100, Mostowiec Dominik wrote:
Hi,
When I stress testing haproxy and reload it with -sf option:
The server is now under siege...[error] socket: unable to connect sock.c:222:
Connection reset by peer
[error] socket: unable to connect sock.c:222:
2012/3/21 Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu:
Can I do something to fix this?
Krisztian Ivancso is working on FD passing between the old and the new
process, which should catch most of these issues. The difficulty remains
in identifying which FD can be reused and possibly adjusted when a number
of
6 matches
Mail list logo
