Re: travis-ci: should we drop openssl-1.1.0 and replace it with 3.0 ?

2019-11-20 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 11:57:56PM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote: > Testing and implementing build fixes for APIs while they are under active > development not only takes away precious dev time, it's also causes our own > code to be messed up with workarounds possibly only needed for specific >

Re: travis-ci: should we drop openssl-1.1.0 and replace it with 3.0 ?

2019-11-19 Thread Lukas Tribus
Hello, On Tuesday, 19 November 2019, Илья Шипицин wrote: > yep, 3.0 stands for openssl master branch. > the point is to catch incompatibilities before it is released. > I am objecting to this. This can be done WHEN openssl declares that the API is stable. Testing and implementing build fixes

Re: travis-ci: should we drop openssl-1.1.0 and replace it with 3.0 ?

2019-11-19 Thread Илья Шипицин
Proxy > *Subject:* Re: travis-ci: should we drop openssl-1.1.0 and replace it > with 3.0 ? > > > > well, we can actually build bigger matrix by adding builds. I just want to > save some electricity on non needed builds. > > > > вт, 19 нояб. 2019 г. в 22:41, Илья Ши

RE: travis-ci: should we drop openssl-1.1.0 and replace it with 3.0 ?

2019-11-19 Thread Gibson, Brian (IMS)
Шипицин [mailto:chipits...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:48 PM To: HAProxy Subject: Re: travis-ci: should we drop openssl-1.1.0 and replace it with 3.0 ? well, we can actually build bigger matrix by adding builds. I just want to save some electricity on non needed builds. вт, 19

Re: travis-ci: should we drop openssl-1.1.0 and replace it with 3.0 ?

2019-11-19 Thread Илья Шипицин
well, we can actually build bigger matrix by adding builds. I just want to save some electricity on non needed builds. вт, 19 нояб. 2019 г. в 22:41, Илья Шипицин : > hello, > > https://www.openssl.org/source/ says "The 1.1.0 series is currently only > receiving security fixes and will go out of