Re: [Harbour] MT extensions

2008-10-30 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Hi Przemek, This looks good to me, but the name CRITICAL to me doesn't really seem to imply the underlying functionality, it also sounds a bit Windows-like, so if possible, I'd suggest some other name. Like MUTEX FUNC|PROC. As for making hb_mutexCreate() a special function exception allowed in

Re: [Harbour] Which standard GUI for Harbour

2008-10-30 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Hi Lorenzo, We are launching our new web site where we say Terminal/GUI but we miss the ( full ) GUI part. We can add a list of the several h*, x* and v* guis created so far for Harbour but then we need to find answers to questions like which is the best?, which one to choose?. Clearly here

RE: [Harbour] Harbour Web site - Preview #2 (Update)

2008-10-30 Thread Massimo Belgrano
Newsletters? Mailing List? I read is as newsgruop witt gmane -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Szakáts Viktor Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 9:04 AM To: Harbour Project Main Developer List. Subject: Re: [Harbour] Harbour Web site - Preview

Re: [Harbour] Which standard GUI for Harbour

2008-10-30 Thread Lorenzo Fiorini
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 8:36 AM, Szakáts Viktor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unless there is a clear and agreed direction on which free product is the best, maybe we should just present an alphabetically sorted list of all known products, one list for free and one list for commercial solutions.

R: [Harbour] Which standard GUI for Harbour

2008-10-30 Thread Maurizio la Cecilia
Hi Lorenzo, We are launching our new web site where we say Terminal/GUI but we miss the ( full ) GUI part. We can add a list of the several h*, x* and v* guis created so far for Harbour but then we need to find answers to questions like which is the best?, which one to choose?. Clearly here

RE: [Harbour] Which standard GUI for Harbour

2008-10-30 Thread Massimo Belgrano
-Original Message- That's not really our job, plus who will tell which is the best? I provision a huge debate. The debate itself BTW, would be very nice to see, as I also cannot see the strengths/weaknesses of various implementations in full detail, especially when they are used in

Re: [Harbour] Which standard GUI for Harbour

2008-10-30 Thread Szakáts Viktor
In this case we should choose carefully what's in the list. Some of them are in IMHO not in line with the quality standard of Harbour. It would be a pity that a bad experience with one of these GUIs will translate to Harbour. Yes, I completely agree. But since this may also start debates, as

Re: R: [Harbour] Which standard GUI for Harbour

2008-10-30 Thread Lorenzo Fiorini
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Maurizio la Cecilia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: None of the existing GUI can be elected to a standard. What I meant was: what we'll answer when a user will ask Which is the Harbour's GUI lib? Also in Java there are Swing, SWT and many others but if you buy a book

Re: [Harbour] Which standard GUI for Harbour

2008-10-30 Thread Szakáts Viktor
I like GTWXW the best (work of Marek Paliwoda, BTW how is he these days?). Purely based on source code and downloadable package I've seen (I didn't use any of these yet). Unfortunately this is no more made available to the public. Big loss IMO. Can you giv e more information regarding GTWXW

[Harbour] RE: Harbour Digest, Vol 24, Issue 138

2008-10-30 Thread Horodyski Marek (PZUZ)
Message: 2 Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:37:52 +0100 From: Przemyslaw Czerpak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Harbour] MT extensions To: Harbour Project Main Developer List. harbour@harbour-project.org Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hi All, [...] 2.

Re: R: [Harbour] Which standard GUI for Harbour

2008-10-30 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Looking at the source / samples, xhgtk looks very nice. Looks like GTK+ can also run on OS X. There seem to exist some immature and parallel efforts to make this happen, some requiring X11, some running natively. Overall, it's promising. I wonder if it's possible to static link all GTK+

Re: [Harbour] RE: Harbour Digest, Vol 24, Issue 138

2008-10-30 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Hi Marek, Viktor, when can You create binary version with new functional ? I don't know how read from svn. I can create a binary build for current trunk. Which C compiler do you use? Brgds, Viktor ___ Harbour mailing list

Re: [Harbour] RE: Harbour Digest, Vol 24, Issue 138

2008-10-30 Thread Szakáts Viktor
BTW, what's not working for you with SVN download? As another option, you may get the daily source from our homepage, it's now working fine: http://harbour-project.org/harbour-nightly.zip Brgds, Viktor On 2008.10.30., at 13:45, Szakáts Viktor wrote: Hi Marek, Viktor, when can You create

Re: [Harbour] Re: Harbour under OS/2

2008-10-30 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, David Arturo Macias Corona wrote: Hi David, Now we have a new error in two places: - ../../harbour.c:56:22: error: hbverbld.h: No such file or directory It looks like a problem with your local environment setting. hbverbld.h is created dynamically in

Re: R: [Harbour] Which standard GUI for Harbour

2008-10-30 Thread Lorenzo Fiorini
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Szakáts Viktor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looking at the source / samples, xhgtk looks very nice. I agree I also find it very clean and well coded ( at least at prg level ). And if you try to use glade with it it seems even more interesting. It gives the ( wrong )

RE: [Harbour] Which standard GUI for Harbour

2008-10-30 Thread Massimo Belgrano
All information I have is from the homepage of the project, Google for HbWxW. There are some nice screenshots there. Win / Linux are supported. Syntax is OOP. xHarbour bindings for wxWidgets Yes I know not recognized as GTWXW IS xHarbour bindings for wxWidgets Best of multiplaform

Re: [Harbour] Re: Harbour under OS/2

2008-10-30 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: Hi Viktor, Also, I'm afraid I could have created problems for other versions / brands of OS/2 C compilers, since these seem to be new warnings. Can't really judge this from here. It's OK. The older GCC version do not report warning when unsigned

[Harbour] 2008-10-30 15:03 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)

2008-10-30 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
2008-10-30 15:03 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl) * harbour/include/hbvmpub.h + added HB_VM_ISFUNC(), HB_VM_FUNCUNREF() and HB_VM_EXECUTE() macros to operate on HB_SYMB structure * harbour/source/vm/hvm.c * harbour/source/vm/classes.c * use

Re: [Harbour] Which standard GUI for Harbour

2008-10-30 Thread Lorenzo Fiorini
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Szakáts Viktor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I better like lighter and naturally web-like apps. We've moved 60% of the apps to browser using only Harbour, rpc, xml and Javascript. The results are great so far ( not said by me ) but as usual it's the last 20% that

[Harbour] RE: Harbour Digest, Vol 24, Issue 142

2008-10-30 Thread Horodyski Marek (PZUZ)
Message: 2 Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:45:18 +0100 From: Szak?ts Viktor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Harbour] RE: Harbour Digest, Vol 24, Issue 138 [...] Hi Marek, Viktor, when can You create binary version with new functional ? I don't know how read from svn. I can create a binary build

Re: [Harbour] Re: Harbour under OS/2

2008-10-30 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Hi Przemek, David and Maurilio, Hi Viktor, Also, I'm afraid I could have created problems for other versions / brands of OS/2 C compilers, since these seem to be new warnings. Can't really judge this from here. It's OK. The older GCC version do not report warning when unsigned char/signed

Re: R: [Harbour] Which standard GUI for Harbour

2008-10-30 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Looking at the source / samples, xhgtk looks very nice. I agree I also find it very clean and well coded ( at least at prg level ). And if you try to use glade with it it seems even more interesting. It gives the ( wrong ) idea that in few days you can rewrite everything :) :) I'll take

Re: [Harbour] Which standard GUI for Harbour

2008-10-30 Thread Szakáts Viktor
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Szakáts Viktor harbour. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I better like lighter and naturally web-like apps. We've moved 60% of the apps to browser using only Harbour, rpc, xml and Javascript. The results are great so far ( not said by me ) but as usual it's the last

[Harbour] RE: Harbour Digest, Vol 24, Issue 142

2008-10-30 Thread Horodyski Marek (PZUZ)
Message: 3 Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:49:35 +0100 From: Szak?ts Viktor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Harbour] RE: Harbour Digest, Vol 24, Issue 138 [...] BTW, what's not working for you with SVN download? As another option, you may get the daily source from our homepage, it's now working fine:

R: R: [Harbour] Which standard GUI for Harbour

2008-10-30 Thread Maurizio la Cecilia
What I meant was: what we'll answer when a user will ask Which is the Harbour's GUI lib? Also in Java there are Swing, SWT and many others but if you buy a book about Java you'll find that Swing IS the Java GUI for desktop apps. Just this i was meaning. None of existing GUI can be

RE: R: [Harbour] Which standard GUI for Harbour

2008-10-30 Thread Massimo Belgrano
Not bcc? Will with the next release change Harbour default c compiler to MSVC on win32 platform? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Szakáts Viktor Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:32 PM To: Harbour Project Main Developer List. Subject:

Re: [Harbour] Which standard GUI for Harbour

2008-10-30 Thread Alex Strickland
Lorenzo Fiorini wrote: We've moved 60% of the apps to browser using only Harbour, rpc, xml and Javascript. rpc? Do you mind saying a little on how you are using this, and using which tools? TIA Alex ___ Harbour mailing list

Re: [Harbour] Which standard GUI for Harbour

2008-10-30 Thread Szakáts Viktor
xHarbour bindings for wxWidgets Yes I know not recognized as GTWXW IS xHarbour bindings for wxWidgets Best of multiplaform And wxWidgets is also based on GTK+, so GTK+ seems like a trend as far as fat desktop goes. paradigm (with all its faults) inside a web-browser Sorry but afaik is not

RE: [Harbour] Which standard GUI for Harbour

2008-10-30 Thread Massimo Belgrano
Vnc2swf is a cross-platform screen recording tool for ShockWave Flash (swf) format. Vnc2swf comes with two different implementations: Python version (pyvnc2swf): [Linux, FreeBSD, Solaris, Mac OS X, and Windows. ] C version (vnc2swf): [Unix, Linux ,Mac OS X] -Original Message- From:

Re: R: [Harbour] Which standard GUI for Harbour

2008-10-30 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Not bcc? BCC is off of my table. [ It has only two advantages: compilation speed, and small footprint of the devel tools. ] Will with the next release change Harbour default c compiler to MSVC on win32 platform? Well, there is no such thing as default C compiler, since both BCC and MSVC

Re: [Harbour] Which standard GUI for Harbour

2008-10-30 Thread Szakáts Viktor
That would be very nice. Brgds, Viktor On 2008.10.30., at 17:14, Lorenzo Fiorini wrote: On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Szakáts Viktor harbour. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tell us if there is an open demo, I'm sure some of us would be interested to see your solution in real life.

Re: [Harbour] Which standard GUI for Harbour

2008-10-30 Thread Lorenzo Fiorini
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Alex Strickland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: rpc? Do you mind saying a little on how you are using this, and using which tools? We use only Harbour, hbtip, hbxml and FireFox+Ajax+Javascript. The idea is not revolutionary. The exactly same exe that uses gtwvt

RE: R: [Harbour] Which standard GUI for Harbour

2008-10-30 Thread Massimo Belgrano
What think about a staring page for win with all step for using harbour with one from msvc and gcc? Have somebody here distributed application on win32 with msvc/gcc with a high number of user? There is no way for interchange lib between bcc,msvc,gcc? GCC target processors as of version 4.3

Re: [Harbour] wince (wcecon not ruuning on PocketPc)

2008-10-30 Thread Abeb
How did you compile Harbour for WinCE? hbcemk ./wcecon Used platform, C compiler and build scripts. under msys mingw32 Harbour 1.0.1 Intl. (Rev. 9429) Harbour itself was build with make_gnu_xmingwce.sh wcecon will not run under windows ( it will say ... not a valid w32 application )

[Harbour] Harbour Future ('Standard' GUI)

2008-10-30 Thread Roberto Lopez
Hi All, I'm developing an application right now, but, since the application must be accessible to the general public via the web, I've decided to use HTML+PHP+MYSQL. As an xBase programmer I feel very bad. I could use Harbour CGI but, run binaries on web servers are not always possible and

Re: [Harbour] Which standard GUI for Harbour

2008-10-30 Thread Vailton Renato
Hi! We are launching our new web site where we say Terminal/GUI but we miss the ( full ) GUI part. We can add a list of the several h*, x* and v* guis created so far for Harbour but then we need to find answers to questions like which is the best?, which one to choose?. Clearly here the

RE: [Harbour] Which standard GUI for Harbour

2008-10-30 Thread Massimo Belgrano
I Agree I notice that Also Pritpal sample of element of gui inside-outside GT is intresting (gtwvg) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vailton Renato Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 6:59 PM To: Harbour Project Main Developer List. Subject:

Re: R: [Harbour] Which standard GUI for Harbour

2008-10-30 Thread Szakáts Viktor
What think about a staring page for win with all step for using harbour with one from msvc and gcc? It's just setting up the compiler (as per respective compiler's docs), and running make_vc.bat for MSVC (exactly the same as for BCC, except the name of the batch file). For MinGW+msys it's

Re: [Harbour] Which standard GUI for Harbour

2008-10-30 Thread Vailton Renato
I just can not commit to mount an example of each GUI because I am busy with a few things about the company and the rest of the site details ... If someone wants to send me at least a few screens of sample I'll create a page with information about this. This if all find something viable ... but

Re: [Harbour] Which standard GUI for Harbour

2008-10-30 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Hi Renato, On 2008.10.30., at 20:49, Vailton Renato wrote: I just can not commit to mount an example of each GUI because I am busy with a few things about the company and the rest of the site details ... If someone wants to send me at least a few screens of sample I'll create a page with

[Harbour] 2008-10-30 21:56 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)

2008-10-30 Thread Szakáts Viktor
2008-10-30 21:56 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) * contrib/make_b32_all.bat * contrib/make_vc_all.bat * contrib/make_gcc_all.sh + Added support for GNU-make features HB_CONTRIBLIBS, and HB_CONTRIB_ADDONS. Not tested in make_gcc_all.sh. * config/w32/msvc.cf

Re: [Harbour] RE: Harbour Digest, Vol 24, Issue 138

2008-10-30 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, Horodyski Marek (PZUZ) wrote: Hi Marek, Przemek, how can I write this : Function appServer( appName) // for example appName is 'RAPORT_024' Static appStorage := {} // this variable can be ohne for all thread, like CLASS STATIC VARIABLE Harbour supports also THREAD

[Harbour] Intel CPU optimization switches

2008-10-30 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Hi all, Is there any opinions on starting to optimize our Windows C compiler switches? I mean, what would be the oldest Intel CPU Harbour should support in _default_ builds? Minimum CPU requirements for different Windows versions: - Win95: 386DX, 486 recommended - Win98/ME: 486, Pentium

Re: [Harbour] MT extensions

2008-10-30 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
like MUTEX STATIC s_mtx. Which means the variable is a MUTEX per definition. Or maybe just MUTEX s_mtx, but that may make things more complicated to implement. I do not find it more stranger then current: static s1 := CTOD( ) static s2 := HB_STOD( 20081030 ) static s3 := UPPER( abc

Re: [Harbour] MT extensions

2008-10-30 Thread Szakáts Viktor
not find it more stranger then current: static s1 := CTOD( ) static s2 := HB_STOD( 20081030 ) static s3 := UPPER( abc ) static s4 := EMPTY( 1 ) static s5 := IIF( AT( c, abcdef ) != 0, 10, 20 ) [...] These are side effects of compile time optimization, and at the end of the day all

[Harbour] 2008-10-31 02:05 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)

2008-10-30 Thread Szakáts Viktor
2008-10-31 02:05 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) * make_b32.mak * contrib/mtpl_b32.mak * config/w32/bcc32.cf - Added -4 switch, which means Intel 386 CPUs are not not supported by default. * make_vc.mak + Added -GA switch to MSVC 32/64 which creates smaller

[Harbour] 2008-10-31 02:26 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)

2008-10-30 Thread Szakáts Viktor
2008-10-31 02:26 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) * make_vc.mak - Removed -GS- option for WinCE. MS recommends this to be there for safety. If someone wants to disable, it can be done with C_USR. -- Brgds, Viktor ___

Re: [Harbour] Harbour Web site - Preview #2 (Update)

2008-10-30 Thread Phil Barnett
On Thursday 30 October 2008 05:08:10 am Szakáts Viktor wrote: We have a mailing-list. [ which happens to be replicated in several newsgroups/web sites, making it much complicated (or even possible) to find anything via web search engines (Google), due to multiple matches from these different

Re: [Harbour] wince (wcecon not ruuning on PocketPc)

2008-10-30 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, Abeb wrote: Hi, How did you compile Harbour for WinCE? hbcemk ./wcecon Used platform, C compiler and build scripts. under msys mingw32 Harbour 1.0.1 Intl. (Rev. 9429) Harbour itself was build with make_gnu_xmingwce.sh I've just check it and some modifications in

Re: [Harbour] wince (wcecon not ruuning on PocketPc)

2008-10-30 Thread Pritpal Bedi
Hello Przemek I've just check it and some modifications in GTWVT broke WinCE build. I took older GTWVT and updated it for recent modifications in core code (MT) and it works correctly. I cannot say now what is wrong because I haven't checked recent extensions to GTWVT and I can make WinCE tests

[Harbour] 2008-10-30 21:24 UTC-0800 Pritpal Bedi ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

2008-10-30 Thread Pritpal Bedi
2008-10-30 21:24 UTC-0800 Pritpal Bedi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * harbour/source/rtl/gtwvt/gtwvt.c * harbour/source/rtl/gtwvt/gtwvt.h + Transfereed two static variables to HB_GTWVT structure. Multi-thread/console protection. Regards Pritpal Bedi -- View this message in context: