[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10594] trunk/harbour

2009-03-12 Thread vszakats
Revision: 10594 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10594view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2009-03-12 09:29:50 + (Thu, 12 Mar 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-03-12 10:28 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) * source/rtl/achoice.prg

Re: [Harbour] Memoedit() - UserFunc == YES and EDITABLE == NO

2009-03-12 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Guys, Thanks for the examples, the problem is apparently that HBMemoEditor() class (in memoedit.prg) calls ::Edit() method of HBEditor() super class, which calls ::KeyboardHook() which is overridden by HBMemoEditor(), and which in turn calls ::Edit() method again. Hence the infinite loop. Seem

Re: [Harbour] HB_BUILD_DEBUG

2009-03-12 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Now you're not, please try with latest SVN :) Brgds, Viktor On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Francesco Saverio Giudice i...@fsgiudice.com wrote: Hi Viktor, Il 11/03/2009 22.45, Viktor Szakáts ha scritto: Hi Francesco, HB_BUILD_DEBUG isn't (yet) implemented in the GNU Make system. Ah,

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10582] trunk/harbour/ChangeLog

2009-03-12 Thread Vladislav Lavrecky
Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote: On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Vladislav Lavrecky wrote: Hi, achoice with additional redraw on exit are ok I test it previously, but in my message just an example To fix achoice we need to add + DispPage( acItems, alSelect, nTop, nLeft, nRight, nNumRows, 0, nAtTop,

Re: [Harbour] feature request. K_CTRL_* should not overlap with other codes

2009-03-12 Thread Viktor Szakáts
This would be good, especially since on certain GTs the number of usable keys are scarce (no Alt+ combinations f.e.), so enabling these CTRL keys could certainly help on shortcut congestion. But users should enable it explicitly by using INKEY_ flag to keep Clipper compatibility. I don't know

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10595] trunk/harbour

2009-03-12 Thread vszakats
Revision: 10595 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10595view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2009-03-12 09:59:20 + (Thu, 12 Mar 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-03-12 10:55 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) *

Re: [Harbour] nasty bug: in RDDADS + scopeactive + dbskip(0)

2009-03-12 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Seems like a valid problem. Anyone with a suggestion? Brgds, Viktor On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 6:21 PM, AbeB abe.b...@att.net wrote: dbskip(0) will move the record pointer to phantom record (honoring the scope). other RDDS don't do that -- #include ads.ch proc main()

Re: [Harbour] Character encoding in Linux

2009-03-12 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Barry Jackson wrote: Hi, What character encoding settings in Linux will display this correctly using the Clipper graphics characters? It did work but now it uses the wrong character set. Nothing has changed here in Harbour code. Check your terminal settings (used font,

Re: [Harbour] Error in latest SVN?

2009-03-12 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Hi all, AFAICS this wasn't added since then, is the BCC warning still there? Brgds, Viktor On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Pritpal Bedi bediprit...@hotmail.comwrote: Przemek Przemyslaw Czerpak-2 wrote: #if defined(__BORLANDC__) !defined(HB_ARCH_64BIT) #undef MAKELONG

Re: [Harbour] nasty bug: in RDDADS + scopeactive + dbskip(0)

2009-03-12 Thread Massimo Belgrano
Seem that skip 0 not allow append I have a lot of skip 0 in my application, so is not good for me also inserting a dbcommit() skip 0 remove deleted record I not have a solution for this 2009/3/12 Viktor Szakáts harbour...@syenar.hu: Seems like a valid problem. Anyone with a suggestion? Brgds,

[Harbour] gtxwc and left handed mouse

2009-03-12 Thread Lorenzo Fiorini
I've a user that uses the mouse left handed under Linux. How can I configure gtxwc to switch the click buttons? best regards, Lorenzo ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Re: [Harbour] Build xhgtk inside harbour

2009-03-12 Thread Viktor Szakáts
FWIW, IMO it would also be very nice to see xhgtk integrated under the Harbour contrib tree. For sure this is much more a decision from the xhgtk authors, than us, but it would be nice, and probably the best choice towards portable GUI. xhgtk has a big bunch of 3rd party dependencies, but

Re: [Harbour] Build xhgtk inside harbour

2009-03-12 Thread Massimo Belgrano
Hi agree for xhgtk in contrib I Hope that HBGTK follow t WvgParts class modal (GTWVG) compatible with Xbase++XbpParts and implement also a GT If Following the same class structure the make the code portable. New()|Init() / Create() / Configure() / Destroy(). In this area also QT seem

Re: [Harbour] Shouldn't utils like hbrun, hbmk2, hbtest, ... be shared

2009-03-12 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Hi Lorenzo, On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Lorenzo Fiorini lorenzo.fior...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Viktor Szakáts harbour...@syenar.hu wrote: Just found this mail. I don't wants to force you to use shared libs simply under Linux static linking is deprecated.

Re: [Harbour] Build xhgtk inside harbour

2009-03-12 Thread Marcos Gambeta
Massimo Belgrano escreveu: In this area also QT seem interesting but is not present any wrapper library afaik Massimo, See the link: http://www.magsoftinfo.com.br/blog/?cat=9 HbQt is LGPL. Wait few days to see the code. Regards, Marcos Gambeta

Re: [Harbour] Build xhgtk inside harbour

2009-03-12 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Hi agree for xhgtk in contrib I Hope that HBGTK follow t WvgParts class modal (GTWVG) compatible with Xbase++XbpParts and implement also a GT If Following the same class structure the make the code portable. New()|Init() / Create() / Configure() / Destroy(). In this area also QT seem

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10596] trunk/harbour

2009-03-12 Thread druzus
Revision: 10596 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10596view=rev Author: druzus Date: 2009-03-12 12:26:39 + (Thu, 12 Mar 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-03-12 13:32 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl) *

Re: [Harbour] Build xhgtk inside harbour

2009-03-12 Thread Ernad Husremovic
Great news ! Is it implemented similar to the qtRuby, qtPython ? They are generating bindings automatically all the classes from the framework with some tools (cpp2xml, kalyptus, qtsmoke ..) ? Maybe you have wrote that on your blog, but I don't understand spanish language :). Great effort,

Re: [Harbour] Build xhgtk inside harbour

2009-03-12 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Great! I wanted to mention QT as the other great contender for portable GUI, a wish apparently come true. Brgds, Viktor On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Marcos Gambeta marcosgamb...@uol.com.brwrote: Massimo Belgrano escreveu: In this area also QT seem interesting but is not present any

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10582] trunk/harbour/ChangeLog

2009-03-12 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Vladislav Lavrecky wrote: Hi, Can you create a small .prg example which illustrates achoice() incompatibilities? We can put it in tests/ directory so it can be used to verify future modifications. I write small exapmle - Barman menu :) to better illustrate achoice()

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10597] trunk/harbour

2009-03-12 Thread druzus
Revision: 10597 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10597view=rev Author: druzus Date: 2009-03-12 12:54:08 + (Thu, 12 Mar 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-03-12 14:00 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl) +

[Harbour] GPL + Harbour exception to LGPL ?

2009-03-12 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Hi all, What is the difference between GPL + Harbour exception and LGPL? I reckon LGPL wasn't nearly available when Harbour was born, so we had to come up with our own solution, but since now LGPL is around, shouldn't we consider switching our unique license to this standard one? For me these

Re: [Harbour] Build xhgtk inside harbour

2009-03-12 Thread Marcos Gambeta
Ernad Husremovic escreveu: Great news ! Is it implemented similar to the qtRuby, qtPython ? They are generating bindings automatically all the classes from the framework with some tools (cpp2xml, kalyptus, qtsmoke ..) ? Maybe you have wrote that on your blog, but I don't understand spanish

Re: [Harbour] Build xhgtk inside harbour

2009-03-12 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Ernad Husremovic wrote: Hi, Is it implemented similar to the qtRuby, qtPython ? They are generating bindings automatically all the classes from the framework with some tools (cpp2xml, kalyptus, qtsmoke ..) ? Maybe you have wrote that on your blog, but I don't

Re: [Harbour] GPL + Harbour exception to LGPL ?

2009-03-12 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: Hi all, What is the difference between GPL + Harbour exception and LGPL? Static linking. For LGPL libraries you have to give final user a chance to upgrade the LGPL part of binaries, f.e. because some serious bugs in the LGPL code was fixed. You can

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10594] trunk/harbour

2009-03-12 Thread Vladislav Lavrecky
vszak...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Revision: 10594 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10594view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2009-03-12 09:29:50 + (Thu, 12 Mar 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-03-12 10:28 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01

Re: [Harbour] HB_BUILD_DEBUG

2009-03-12 Thread Francesco Saverio Giudice
Hi Viktor, Il 12/03/2009 10.44, Viktor Szakáts ha scritto: Now you're not, please try with latest SVN :) Thank you, I will try :-) Best regards, Francesco ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10594] trunk/harbour

2009-03-12 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Variant - 2 Delete all previously posted DispPage( acItems, alSelect, nTop, nLeft, nRight, nNumRows, 0, nAtTop, nItems, bSelect, nRowsClr ) lines and add in all CASE entry before lFinished := .T. (7-lines) and before nPos := 0 (if exist) [...] + DispLine( acItems[ nPos ], nTop + (

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10594] trunk/harbour

2009-03-12 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: Variant - 2 Delete all previously posted DispPage( acItems, alSelect, nTop, nLeft, nRight, nNumRows, 0, nAtTop, nItems, bSelect, nRowsClr ) lines and add in all CASE entry before lFinished := .T. (7-lines) and before nPos := 0 (if exist)

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10594] trunk/harbour

2009-03-12 Thread Viktor Szakáts
#2 is closer, but even that isn't fully compatible, unfortunately I don't have the time and tech env now to fully oversee the nPos == 0 case and do extensive side-by-side tests, so rather than messing up the code, I'd like to ask someone to jump on this if current state isn't good enough.

Re: [Harbour] GPL + Harbour exception to LGPL ?

2009-03-12 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Hi Przemek, Thanks, I'm still not sure I understand the exact implications of LGPL to Harbour, but for me it's just as perfect to leave it as is. Anyhow I wonder if there isn't any other standard license which would _properly_ fit Harbour. If there is, we should IMO consider using it for

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10594] trunk/harbour

2009-03-12 Thread Vladislav Lavrecky
Viktor Szakáts wrote: #2 is closer, but even that isn't fully compatible, unfortunately I don't have the time and tech env now to fully oversee the nPos == 0 case and do extensive side-by-side tests, so rather than messing up the code, I'd like to ask someone to jump on this if current state

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10594] trunk/harbour

2009-03-12 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Okay, I can commit that up to this point, and you can continue from there. Brgds, Viktor On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Vladislav Lavrecky l...@ldz.lv wrote: Viktor Szakáts wrote: #2 is closer, but even that isn't fully compatible, unfortunately I don't have the time and tech env now to

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10598] trunk/harbour

2009-03-12 Thread vszakats
Revision: 10598 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10598view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2009-03-12 15:10:57 + (Thu, 12 Mar 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-03-12 16:10 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) * source/rtl/achoice.prg

RE: [Harbour] HB_BUILD_DEBUG

2009-03-12 Thread Horodyski Marek (PZUZ)
-Original Message- From: Francesco Saverio Giudice [mailto:i...@fsgiudice.com] Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 2:34 PM To: Harbour Project Main Developer List. Subject: Re: [Harbour] HB_BUILD_DEBUG ... Thank you, I will try :-) Best regards, Francesco Francesco, can you add to uhttpd

Re: [Harbour] feature request. K_CTRL_* should not overlap with other codes

2009-03-12 Thread AbeB
the K_CTRL_* are already implemented. I had cut the following from xharbour's setkey.ch into harbour's and rebuild harbour, and it just works (in GTWVT). i don't know about K_SH_* key's in xharbour it's selected by #defining HB_EXT_INKEY when building xharbour. Viktor Szakáts wrote: This

[Harbour] GTWVG and Buffered Console

2009-03-12 Thread Pritpal Bedi
Hello Everybody I am almost done with buffered console on GTWVG. By buffered console I mean all paint operations are done in memory and only final output is transferred to console on screen. In Clipper parlance you can think it synonymous as DispBegin()/DispEnd() but not exactly the same.

RE: [Harbour] HB_BUILD_DEBUG

2009-03-12 Thread Pritpal Bedi
Marek Horodyski Marek (PZUZ) wrote: Thank you, I will try :-) Best regards, Francesco Francesco, can you add to uhttpd small example with log and password user ? Please use separate thread to post new query. It is always a problem to locate and loose the reference and context of the

Re: RE: [Harbour] HB_BUILD_DEBUG

2009-03-12 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Pritpal Bedi wrote: Hi, Thank you, I will try :-) Best regards, Francesco Francesco, can you add to uhttpd small example with log and password user ? Please use separate thread to post new query. It is always a problem to locate and loose the reference and context

RE: [Harbour] GTWVG and Buffered Console

2009-03-12 Thread Horodyski Marek (PZUZ)
-Original Message- From: Pritpal Bedi [mailto:bediprit...@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 4:51 PM To: harbour@harbour-project.org Subject: [Harbour] GTWVG and Buffered Console Hello Everybody I am almost done with buffered console on GTWVG. [...] So please post your vote

[Harbour] How can man logged with uHTTPD

2009-03-12 Thread Horodyski Marek (PZUZ)
Francesco, can you add to uhttpd small example with loging/password user on www ? Regards, Marek Horodyski ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Re: [Harbour] GTWVG and Buffered Console

2009-03-12 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Pritpal Bedi wrote: Hi, I am almost done with buffered console on GTWVG. By buffered console I mean all paint operations are done in memory and only final output is transferred to console on screen. In Clipper parlance you can think it synonymous as

Re: [Harbour] GTWVG and Buffered Console

2009-03-12 Thread Viktor Szakáts
I'd suggest to do this after the release if gtwvt is also involved. On 3/12/09, Przemyslaw Czerpak dru...@acn.waw.pl wrote: On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Pritpal Bedi wrote: Hi, I am almost done with buffered console on GTWVG. By buffered console I mean all paint operations are done in memory and

[Harbour] hbmk2 - need a little adjustment?

2009-03-12 Thread Vailton Renato
I'm trying to compile the hbpgsql.lib manually with hbmk2 utility. The command line used is: hbmk2 -trace -ldflag:-Ic:\PostgresPlus\8.3\include -hblib pgrdd.prg postgres.c tpostgre.prg And the problem is with -ldflag where I try to pass aditional parameter to the linker/compiler only he gives me

Re: [Harbour] hbmk2 - need a little adjustment?

2009-03-12 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Hi Renato, (I realized this might not be your first name, sorry and pls correct me) As for ldflags option, it's meant to pass flags to the linker, but what you need is to pass a flag to the C compiler, so in your case -cflag: should be used instead. Brgds, Viktor On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 7:10

Re: [Harbour] GTWVG and Buffered Console

2009-03-12 Thread Pritpal Bedi
Hi Viktor Viktor Szakáts wrote: I'd suggest to do this after the release if gtwvt is also involved. GTWVT is not involved. BYW it is much easier to implement this proto in GTWVT then GTWVG. And it will be a performance boost. I will show the code shortly. Regards Pritpal Bedi --

Re: [Harbour] GTWVG and Buffered Console

2009-03-12 Thread Pritpal Bedi
Hello Przemek Przemyslaw Czerpak-2 wrote: GTXWC internally uses bitmap with the whole screen contents so expose messages are served as simple coping from the internal screen image to real screen. This is exactly what I am doing to GTWVG. I guess you want to make the same in

Re: [Harbour] hbmk2 - need a little adjustment?

2009-03-12 Thread Vailton Renato
Many Thanks! This works fine now with -cflags. And about my name there are no problems, because here in Brazil is accepted Vailton or Renato when to refer someone.. Thanks again. =D 2009/3/12 Viktor Szakáts harbour...@syenar.hu: Hi Renato, (I realized this might not be your first name, sorry

Re: [Harbour] GTWVG and Buffered Console

2009-03-12 Thread Massimo Belgrano
2009/3/12 Pritpal Bedi bediprit...@hotmail.com: I am using gtwvw, in a lot of recent small program , No problem adapting code I Have a more big application made in GTWVW and i am very interested to port in gtwvg Yes I am interested!!! My question is: How many of you are using GTWVG and are

[Harbour] ace32. dll To ace32.lib ??

2009-03-12 Thread Ale SB
How to generate Ace32.lib? My path is; c: \ Ads \ acesdk \ Ace32.dll thanks Ale SB -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ace32.-dll-To-ace32.libtp22466618p22466618.html Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Harbour] ace32. dll To ace32.lib ??

2009-03-12 Thread Vailton Renato
With BCC use: implib acr32.lib ace32.dll Vailton Renato ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Re: [Harbour] Build xhgtk inside harbour

2009-03-12 Thread Phil Krylov
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Przemyslaw Czerpak dru...@acn.waw.pl wrote: On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Ernad Husremovic wrote: Hi, Is it implemented similar to the qtRuby, qtPython ? They are generating bindings automatically all the classes from the framework with some tools (cpp2xml,

[Harbour] Re: GTWVG and Buffered Console

2009-03-12 Thread ftwein
Hi, I am interested. Regards, F.Trautwein ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

[Harbour] Re: GTWVG and Buffered Console

2009-03-12 Thread Mario Simoes Filho
Hi I have several systems running with gtwvw and I am very interested, I use a set of objects based wvw call wvwtools, it is available in http://www.xharbour.com/xhc/index.asp?page=xhc_download_detail.asptype=dlid=133show_i=7show_sub=1 Yes I am very interested!!! thanks for attention

Re: [Harbour] ace32. dll To ace32.lib ??

2009-03-12 Thread Viktor Szakáts
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Massimo Belgrano mbelgr...@deltain.itwrote: You can also made automatically using make_gnu SET HB_INC_ADS=c:\ads\acesdk set HB_DIR_IMPLIB=yes set HB_DIR_ADS=c:\ads\acesdk This is evolving yet, just yesterday HB_DIR_IMPLIB got changed to HB_BUILD_IMPLIB. This

Re: [Harbour] ace32. dll To ace32.lib ??

2009-03-12 Thread Ale SB
Thanks, the same is correct: Sep HB_BUILD_IMPLIB = yes Ale SB -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ace32.-dll-To-ace32.libtp22466618p22487774.html Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Harbour

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10599] trunk/harbour

2009-03-12 Thread vszakats
Revision: 10599 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10599view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2009-03-13 00:16:46 + (Fri, 13 Mar 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-03-13 01:16 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) *

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10600] trunk/harbour

2009-03-12 Thread vszakats
Revision: 10600 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10600view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2009-03-13 00:38:33 + (Fri, 13 Mar 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-03-13 01:36 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) * config/dos/owatcom.cf *

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10601] trunk/harbour

2009-03-12 Thread vszakats
Revision: 10601 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10601view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2009-03-13 01:10:56 + (Fri, 13 Mar 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-03-13 01:45 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) *

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10602] trunk/harbour

2009-03-12 Thread vszakats
Revision: 10602 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10602view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2009-03-13 01:19:40 + (Fri, 13 Mar 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-03-13 02:15 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) *

Re: [Harbour] ace32. dll To ace32.lib ??

2009-03-12 Thread Ale SB
I detect a problem. With MSVC, it was not possible to generate the Lib ace32. This here is my make: SET CC_DIR=c:\VC2008 SET INCLUDE=%CC_DIR%\INCLUDE;%INCLUDE% SET LIB=%CC_DIR%\Lib;%LIB% SET

[Harbour] WinCE / poccce build warnings/errors

2009-03-12 Thread Viktor Szakáts
--- errors: harbour\contrib\gtwvg\gtwvg.h(78): fatal error #1035: Can't find include file olectl.h. harbour\contrib\gtwvg\gtwvg.h(78): fatal error #1035: Can't find include file olectl.h. harbour\contrib\gtwvg\gtwvg.h(78): fatal error #1035: Can't find include file olectl.h.

Re: [Harbour] WinCE / poccce build warnings/errors

2009-03-12 Thread Pritpal Bedi
Hi Viktor Szakáts wrote: --- errors: harbour\contrib\gtwvg\gtwvg.h(78): fatal error #1035: Can't find include file olectl.h. This header is not available in WinCE. As GTWVG takes use of IPicture structure extensively, I am afraid GTWVG have to be commented out for default WinCE

Re: [Harbour] WinCE / poccce build warnings/errors

2009-03-12 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Hi Pritpal, This header is not available in WinCE. As GTWVG takes use of IPicture structure extensively, I am afraid GTWVG have to be commented out for default WinCE builds. As this construct is used at many places, and even if it is commented out, there are many more constructs are in

Re: [Harbour] GTWVG and Buffered Console

2009-03-12 Thread Budyanto Dj.
Hi Pritpal, My question is: How many of you are using GTWVG and are willing to adopt to new prorocol. Believe me, it will be very little effort to change the exiting code but the results will be truely rewarding. Once this is done, I may think to port GTWVW in GTWVG if get a substantial

Re: [Harbour] ace32. dll To ace32.lib ??

2009-03-12 Thread Viktor Szakáts
I cannot tell what's wrong with your setup. I'd suggest to use the recently posted sample scripts as a start for your own script, to rule out any possible differences. Maybe you don't use make_gnu.bat, so HB_LIB_INSTALL isn't defined, and can also double check your paths. I've just tried it

Re: [Harbour] GTWVG and Buffered Console

2009-03-12 Thread Budyanto Dj.
On 12 Mar 2009 at 12:04, Pritpal Bedi wrote: Please note that using CTWin like API in practice eliminates SAVESCREEN/RESTSCREEN making the whole code much simpler. GTWVW was addressing this aspect. I never used CTWIN so cannot comment. GTWVW is aimed as you described but with a

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[10603] trunk/harbour

2009-03-12 Thread vszakats
Revision: 10603 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10603view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2009-03-13 02:22:05 + (Fri, 13 Mar 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-03-13 03:21 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) *

Re: [Harbour] feature request. K_CTRL_* should not overlap with other codes

2009-03-12 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Can't make it work here in a default Harbour build. Tried plain Inkey() and Inkey( 0, INKEY_ALL + INKEY_EXTENDED ). Ctrl+A always returnes 1. Brgds, Viktor On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 4:28 PM, AbeB abe.b...@att.net wrote: the K_CTRL_* are already implemented. I had cut the following from

Re: [Harbour] GPL + Harbour exception to LGPL ?

2009-03-12 Thread Phil Barnett
Viktor Szakáts wrote: Hi all, What is the difference between GPL + Harbour exception and LGPL? I reckon LGPL wasn't nearly available when Harbour was born, so we had to come up with our own solution, but since now LGPL is around, shouldn't we consider switching our unique license to this