-Original Message-
From: Xavi [mailto:jara...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 8:29 PM
To: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
Subject: Re: [Harbour] gcc 4.4.0 warnings
Horodyski Marek (PZUZ) escribió:
[ ... ]
On OpenWatcom it is correctly executet, and on BCC (I do not
Massimo Belgrano writes:
I try a reply with information that i know.
You can't overload a function (hb_errInternal) but a module object
represented by entire file prg.
hb_errInternal() is the only function in the module ( errint.c ) - at
least, at the version of Harbour I use, so I supposed
There should also be hb_errInternalRaw() (also public function) in
that source file.
allow multiple definition is very dubious to me, as there it's very difficult
to know for sure which of the multiple definitions will actually be effective
at runtime. I think this option just suppresses the
Viktor Szakáts writes:
There should also be hb_errInternalRaw() (also public function) in
that source file.
allow multiple definition is very dubious to me, as there it's very difficult
to know for sure which of the multiple definitions will actually be effective
at runtime.
I supposed that
Revision: 11166
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11166view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-29 09:05:10 + (Fri, 29 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-29 11:04 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
- contrib/examples
+
This is the only working solution, unless we move the other
function to a separate function inside Harbour source tree.
I'll do that.
Probably, it isn't needed. I added the modified errint.c to letodb
sources, it looks now like the following ( without headers ):
static BOOL
Now there is other problem - letodb.exe, compiled with mingw, doesn't
run, it gives a message nomnemonic_name.dll isn't found (
nomnemonic_name is a sequence of casual non character symbols ). Does
anyone know why this could happen ?
It's solved. I've made an error in a Makefile ( I
Okay. I'll commit the split anyway, since it's done already, but
it will continue to work with letodb.
BTW, is there anything missing to use hbmk2 to build letodb?
(I've just committed a few more .hbm examples)
Brgds,
Viktor
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Alexander S.Kresin
Revision: 11167
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11167view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-29 10:19:15 + (Fri, 29 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-29 12:18 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg
Revision: 11168
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11168view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-29 10:29:09 + (Fri, 29 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-29 12:25 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* contrib/Makefile
-
Revision: 11169
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11169view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-29 10:35:07 + (Fri, 29 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-29 12:27 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
- examples/hbsuper
+
Hi,
This should be fixed after:
2009-05-29 03:50 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
Brgds,
Viktor
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 3:36 AM, Vailton Renato vail...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to compile uhttp modules with hbmk2 and i got this errors:
BTW, is there anything missing to use hbmk2 to build letodb?
I don't know, I didn't tried it yet.
Regards, Alexander.
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
Hi Alexander,
I don't know, I didn't tried it yet.
I've created for myself .hbm files for letodb, here they are, maybe you
can use it or include it in the Leto CVS. They work for all compilers
(which the source supports of course) and all platforms, I've tried with BCC,
MinGW and MSVC (latter
Revision: 11170
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11170view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-29 11:50:09 + (Fri, 29 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-29 13:49 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg
This code running into xHarbour, but under Harbour, show this error;
Error description:Error BASE/1004 No exported method: NTYPE
Args:
[ 1] = U nil
Stack Calls
===
Called from -NTYPE(0)
Called from ../../txml.prg-TXMLITERATORREGEX:FIND(0)
Called from
Ok, this works fine! Many thanks...
Brgds,
Vailton Renato
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
Sorry I misplace this email :'( This is your output with MinGW .-
0.0
0.0
** N .F.
Ok.. On BCC and Clipper is GPF, Excell handled exception, OW and MingGW work
correctly.
I think of a start-up too MinGW
Revision: 11171
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11171view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-29 14:05:51 + (Fri, 29 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-29 16:02 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg
Attached new ones after minor update, this way it's enough to do this
to create both targets:
Thank you, Viktor. I'll try it.
Regards, Alexander.
___
Harbour mailing list
Revision: 11172
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11172view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-29 15:17:35 + (Fri, 29 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-29 17:13 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg
rafa,
METHOD New( ) CLASS gConfigHarbour
Local oNode, oIter, oNodeLib, cLib, cCheck
::Super:New( )
if ::lOk
oNode := ::oDoc:FindFirst( ::cNode )
if oNode != NIL
oIter := TXmlIteratorRegex( oNode )
oIter := TXmlIteratorRegex():New( oNode )
--
Xavi
rafa
Revision: 11173
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11173view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-29 16:09:51 + (Fri, 29 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-29 18:04 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* contrib/gtwvg/gtwvg.h
Revision: 11174
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11174view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-29 16:15:38 + (Fri, 29 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-29 18:15 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
*
Revision: 11175
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11175view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-29 16:17:10 + (Fri, 29 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-29 18:16 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
*
Revision: 11176
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11176view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-29 16:32:23 + (Fri, 29 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-29 18:31 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
*
Revision: 11177
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11177view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-29 16:38:23 + (Fri, 29 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-29 18:35 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
-
Xavi escribió:
rafa,
METHOD New( ) CLASS gConfigHarbour
Local oNode, oIter, oNodeLib, cLib, cCheck
::Super:New( )
if ::lOk
oNode := ::oDoc:FindFirst( ::cNode )
if oNode != NIL
oIter := TXmlIteratorRegex( oNode )
oIter := TXmlIteratorRegex():New( oNode )
METHOD New( ) CLASS gConfigHarbour
Local oNode, oIter, oNodeLib, cLib, cCheck
::Super:New( )
if ::lOk
oNode := ::oDoc:FindFirst( ::cNode )
if oNode != NIL
oIter := TXmlIteratorRegex( oNode )
oIter := TXmlIteratorRegex():New( oNode )
Ups! Thanks, but...
Hi Viktor,
Il 27/05/2009 2.07, vszak...@users.sourceforge.net ha scritto:
Revision: 11144
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11144view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-27 00:07:09 + (Wed, 27 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
*
Hello Przemek
Is it possible in Harbour that if the code below is executed on a multi cpu
machine,
we could see the multiple PIDs in the task manager. I mean is is possible to
execute threads on
multiple CPUs ?
//
//
hbmk2 letodb.hbp rddleto.hbp
I've copied these two files to the letodb directory, executed this
command and got the following:
hbmk: Processing configuration: c:\harbour\bin\hbmk.cfg
hbmk: Processing: letodb.hbp
hbmk: Processing: rddleto.hbp
hbmk: Error: No source files were specified.
Hi Vailton,
Il 29/05/2009 3.36, Vailton Renato ha scritto:
I'm trying to compile uhttp modules with hbmk2 and i got this errors:
I will check ASAP.
Best regards,
Francesco
PS: remember to update crew list in harbour site with my name, please.
___
hbmk: Processing configuration: c:\harbour\bin\hbmk.cfg
hbmk: Processing: letodb.hbp
hbmk: Processing: rddleto.hbp
hbmk: Error: No source files were specified.
What I did wrong ?
You seem to be using an older version of hbmk2.
[ I've reshuffled the extensions lately, which means current
Francesco, it was an hbmk2 problem, it's okay now, don't spend time on this.
Brgds,
Viktor
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Francesco Saverio Giudice
i...@fsgiudice.com wrote:
Hi Vailton,
Il 29/05/2009 3.36, Vailton Renato ha scritto:
I'm trying to compile uhttp modules with hbmk2 and i got
Revision: 11178
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11178view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-29 17:16:22 + (Fri, 29 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-29 18:35 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* doc/dirstruc.txt
*
Revision: 11179
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11179view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-29 17:29:14 + (Fri, 29 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-29 18:40 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* bin/postinst.bat
!
Hi All,
Is there anything against going rc1?
I also like to propose to change our version number,
as we've definitely done more that 0.1 is worth, also
xhb is now at 1.2, while feature-wise we're ahead.
Any opinions on these?
1.) 1.1.0rc1 (next logical)
2.) 1.2.0rc1 (current xhb major rev)
3.)
Thank you Francesco, take your time.
Brgds,
Viktor
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Francesco Saverio Giudice
i...@fsgiudice.com wrote:
Hi Viktor,
Il 27/05/2009 2.07, vszak...@users.sourceforge.net ha scritto:
Revision: 11144
PS: remember to update crew list in harbour site with my name, please.
I ask one thousand apologies, I passed unnoticed this detail. It's
done now... please just confirm the text of your comments.
Sorry for the delay .
[ Seizing the current message Francesco, a detail in would be
important
Hi Viktor,
just seen your SVN update, thank you.
Best regards,
Francesco
Il 29/05/2009 19.08, Viktor Szakáts ha scritto:
Francesco, it was an hbmk2 problem, it's okay now, don't spend time on this.
Brgds,
Viktor
___
Harbour mailing list
Hi Vailton,
Il 29/05/2009 19.45, Vailton Renato ha scritto:
PS: remember to update crew list in harbour site with my name, please.
I ask one thousand apologies, I passed unnoticed this detail. It's
done now... please just confirm the text of your comments.
Sorry for the delay .
No problem,
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
Hi All,
Is there anything against going rc1?
I also like to propose to change our version number,
as we've definitely done more that 0.1 is worth, also
xhb is now at 1.2, while feature-wise we're ahead.
Any opinions on these?
1.) 1.1.0rc1 (next logical)
2.) 1.2.0rc1
I also like to propose to change our version number,
as we've definitely done more that 0.1 is worth, also
xhb is now at 1.2, while feature-wise we're ahead.
Any opinions on these?
1.) 1.1.0rc1 (next logical)
2.) 1.2.0rc1 (current xhb major rev)
3.) 1.4.0rc1 (my vote)
4) 1.2008.0 (2008
Hi,
Well, the main reason is that users cannot really grasp the difference
between Harbour and xhb. Many of them think they are the same thing.
Now, if we don't adapt / react to that, and always keep low profile, the
notion will be that we're not doing anything, as our version number
suggest
Well, the main reason is that users cannot really grasp the difference
between Harbour and xhb. Many of them think they are the same thing.
Now, if we don't adapt / react to that, and always keep low profile, the
notion will be that we're not doing anything, as our version number
suggest that
Revision: 11180
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11180view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-29 23:12:49 + (Fri, 29 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-30 01:12 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* INSTALL
* Minor
For me sound good Harbour 1.5 because it is a release intermediate from 1.0
to 2.0I have not evaluated the effect of release number in xharbour but we
have a very special content
MultiThrea,Multiwindows,Hbmk2,hbqt,rddsql and the grooving of library like
gtwvg
I think that a lot of user migrating
Revision: 11181
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11181view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-29 23:36:24 + (Fri, 29 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-30 01:33 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Viktor Szakáts harbour...@syenar.hu wrote:
3.) 1.4.0rc1 (my vote)
I vote for 1.5 or 2.0. Surely not 1.1.
Usually x.5 means big update of x but not enough to be x+1 while x+1
means api or internals changes.
It's true that for us they are only numbers but for
Lorenzo Fiorini-2 wrote:
I vote for 1.5 or 2.0. Surely not 1.1.
Usually x.5 means big update of x but not enough to be x+1 while x+1
means api or internals changes.
It's true that for us they are only numbers but for world outside 1
year between 1.0 and 1.1 means low activity.
+10
Has anyone already written a JSON parser/encoder for Harbour?
( if you don't know what JSON is look at json.org )
Is there any C developer interested to add C code for dbf - xml
and/or dbf - json?
The idea is to have C code that reads one or more records with usual
fields,rest,next,for,while
52 matches
Mail list logo
