Re: [Hardhats-members] XINDEX (was: Searching...)

2006-01-02 Thread Jim Self
Kevin wrote: On 1/1/06, Jim Self [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kevin wrote: What I wish was that I was smart enough to write a converter from that older style into the expanded form that I like. The XINDEX utilities include a pretty printer (^XINDX8) that I believe does exactly what you want.

[Hardhats-members] A VT100+ terminal emulation is needed for the new Fileman

2006-01-02 Thread Nancy Anthracite
It is available in Putty as an option For Debian Linux it is: To see what you have: echo $TERM T change it to vt100+: TERM=vt100+ export TERM The terminal definition is in /usr/share/terminfo/v/vt100+ But you all knew that right? I love Linux (sorry Greg). ;-) -- Nancy Anthracite

Re: [Hardhats-members] programmer tools (was: Searching...)

2006-01-02 Thread Jim Self
Kevin wrote: By the way, do you still have that code that would expand just one line. That would be helpful to me. I have a debugger I have written that steps through code. It would be nice to at least see the current line expanded. My web based MUMPS routine viewer can be called at

Re: [Hardhats-members] A VT100+ terminal emulation is needed for the new Fileman

2006-01-02 Thread Kevin Toppenberg
Nancy,I am not clear what you are saying. Are you saying the PuTTY supports an extension to the VT100 supported features? And that you want a terminal created that supports these features? If so, what are the extra features the VT100+ offers? KevinOn 1/2/06, Nancy Anthracite [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Hardhats-members] programmer tools (was: Searching...)

2006-01-02 Thread Kevin Toppenberg
Jim,Thank! I'll check it out.KevinOn 1/2/06, Jim Self [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kevin wrote:By the way, do you still have that code that would expand just one line.That would be helpful to me.I have a debugger I have written that steps throughcode.It would be nice to at least see the current line

[Hardhats-members] More M syntax questions (why would GOTO have multiple arguments?)

2006-01-02 Thread Kevin Toppenberg
Here is another puzzling line of code for me:I DQ= G BAD:Y=U,LI understand that if DQ=, then the test of (Y=U) is checked, and if true, then a GOTO BAD is executed.What I don't understand it when the GOTO L will executed. If that GOTO was a DO, I would assume that the second location would be

Re: [Hardhats-members] More M syntax questions (why would GOTO have multiple arguments?)

2006-01-02 Thread James Gray
If Y=U then it will go to BAD. If Y does not equal U then it will go to L. Jim Gray - Original Message - From: Kevin Toppenberg To: Hardhats Sourceforge Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 7:47 PM Subject: [Hardhats-members] More M syntax questions (why would

Re: [Hardhats-members] A VT100+ terminal emulation is needed for the new Fileman

2006-01-02 Thread Nancy Anthracite
This is why I was looking at VT100+. It's from George's Fileman Readme. 1. SCREENMAN ENHANCEMENTS: -Mouse is now usable when running ScreenMan forms. To use mouse with ScreenMan forms, your terminal emulator needs to be able to receive ANSI standard control sequences to turn mouse on and

Re: [Hardhats-members] More M syntax questions (why would GOTO have multiple arguments?)

2006-01-02 Thread Chris Richardson
Kevin; First true GOTO wins and you never come back (ecept for the logic might cause to happen, but that would have very little to do with the GOTO after it has been triggered. The L is taken only if the IF was true andthe BADPOST-Conditional is false (Y=U). If BAD is taken, then L is

Re: [Hardhats-members] More M syntax questions (why would GOTO have multiple arguments?)

2006-01-02 Thread Kevin Toppenberg
Gosh, I should have thought of that...Actually I wondered if that was the answer and was coming back to decide if post a clarification.Thanks!KevinOn 1/2/06, James Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If Y=U then it will go to BAD. If Y does not equal U then it will go to L. Jim Gray -

Re: [Hardhats-members] A VT100+ terminal emulation is needed for the new Fileman

2006-01-02 Thread Kevin Toppenberg
OK. But that doesn't sound like you need a new terminal entry on the VistA side, just that PuTTY be put in the proper mode. Am I missing something?KevinOn 1/2/06, Nancy Anthracite [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is why I was looking at VT100+.It's from George's Fileman Readme.1. SCREENMAN

Re: [Hardhats-members] A VT100+ terminal emulation is needed for the new Fileman

2006-01-02 Thread Gregory Woodhouse
On Jan 2, 2006, at 7:44 PM, Nancy Anthracite wrote: This is why I was looking at VT100+. It's from George's Fileman Readme. Does VT-100+ mean VT-100 or above? === Gregory Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Good acts are like good poems. One may easily get their drift, but they are not

Re: [Hardhats-members] More M syntax questions (why would GOTO have multiple arguments?)

2006-01-02 Thread Gregory Woodhouse
On Jan 2, 2006, at 7:39 PM, Chris Richardson wrote:Kevin;    First true GOTO wins and you never come back (ecept for the logic might cause to happen, but that would have very little to do with the GOTO after it has been triggered.  The L is taken only if the IF was true and the BAD 

Re: [Hardhats-members] More M syntax questions (why would GOTO have multiple arguments?)

2006-01-02 Thread Gregory Woodhouse
On Jan 2, 2006, at 6:47 PM, Kevin Toppenberg wrote: Here is another puzzling line of code for me: I DQ= G BAD:Y=U,L I understand that if DQ=, then the test of (Y=U) is checked, and if true, then a GOTO BAD is executed. What I don't understand it when the GOTO L will executed. If that

Re: [Hardhats-members] A VT100+ terminal emulation is needed for the new Fileman

2006-01-02 Thread Nancy Anthracite
Maybe I am missing something. I thought I was changing my current teminal emulation to VT100+ when I was in Konsole by running those two commands. The default for Konsole seems to be XTERM. As for VT100+, in some information about the putty VT100+, it says this on this page:

Re: [Hardhats-members] More M syntax questions (why would GOTO have multiple arguments?)

2006-01-02 Thread Chris Richardson
Not really, the post-conditionalized command and the post-conditionalized argument are very distinct and easy to understand. If the command post-conditional is false, you skip the whole command and the argument. If the post-conditionalized argument fails, then you skip to the next argument

Re: [Hardhats-members] More M syntax questions (why would GOTO have multiple arguments?)

2006-01-02 Thread Gregory Woodhouse
On Jan 2, 2006, at 8:23 PM, Chris Richardson wrote:Not really, the post-conditionalized command and the post-conditionalized argument are very distinct and easy to understand.  If the command post-conditional is false, you skip the whole command and the argument.  If the post-conditionalized

Re: [Hardhats-members] A VT100+ terminal emulation is needed for the new Fileman

2006-01-02 Thread Gregory Woodhouse
On Jan 2, 2006, at 8:09 PM, Nancy Anthracite wrote: As for VT100+, in some information about the putty VT100+, it says this on this page: http://the.earth.li/~sgtatham/putty/0.58/htmldoc/ Chapter4.html 4.4.3 Changing the action of the function keys and keypad This option affects the

RE: [Hardhats-members] A VT100+ terminal emulation is needed for the new Fileman

2006-01-02 Thread Thurman Pedigo
I think my favorite emulator of all time was CrossTalk, though I must admit I haven't used in nearly 15 years. Now I use NetTerm. http://www.securenetterm.com/html/netterm.html It's a freebie that has a robust array or terminals, though we use VT320 PC with FileMan. Of course blush all our PC's

Re: [Hardhats-members] A VT100+ terminal emulation is needed for the new Fileman

2006-01-02 Thread Gregory Woodhouse
On Jan 2, 2006, at 8:52 PM, Thurman Pedigo wrote: Does any of the above seem handicapped? I'm not sure I understand. Handicapped in what sense? === Gregory Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] A hero is no braver than an ordinary man, but he is brave five minutes longer. -- Ralph Waldo Emerson

RE: [Hardhats-members] A VT100+ terminal emulation is needed for the new Fileman

2006-01-02 Thread Thurman Pedigo
Just curious whether I am missing some feature everyone expects. Over the years I have tried a number of terminal emulators and (nearly) always wondered if there wasn't something better. After all, we aren't talking the real McCoy. All the programs are trying to look like some hardware device.