If you want to know what happened in WQashington State contact Steve Pence
at DSHS or some of the other harahts who are at Washington State dept of
Social and Health Services. The DSHS adopted DHCP in 1988 at the time of
the SEattle MUG Meeting through the FOIA process for its mental Health
I found this statement about half-way into this document
http://www1.va.gov/vhaitsharing/docs/VA_Health_Information_Sharing_White_Paper_v3.doc
The Bureau of Prisons, within the Department of Justice, also
implemented the DHCP/VistA system in the 1980s but recently replaced it
with a COTS
I bet they did not keep it patched or it would be difficult to believe they
would replace it. But, you never know about what happens to our tax dollars!
On Monday 04 July 2005 02:49 am, Ismet Kursunoglu wrote:
I found this statement about half-way into this document
That could be. Keeping Vista patched is, frankly, a pain in the neck,
and a process requiring a certain level of knowledge of Vista, as
well. But while i agree that this may be a factor, I would suspect
that a more significant factor is a mismatch between what the system
offers (or,
As a result, transferring large volumes of data from one
prison to another is nearly impossible, the department's
experts said. Most medical records are on paper, and when
inmates are moved, their records sometimes fail to catch up.
Thus prison officials often have to make decisions without
Have you called them to let them know about VistA yet? ;-)
On Sunday 03 July 2005 08:01 am, Ismet Kursunoglu wrote:
As a result, transferring large volumes of data from one
prison to another is nearly impossible, the department's
experts said. Most medical records are on paper, and when
On Sunday 03 July 2005 08:01 am, Ismet Kursunoglu wrote:
As a result, transferring large volumes of data from one
prison to another is nearly impossible, the department's
experts said. Most medical records are on paper, and when
inmates are moved, their records sometimes fail to catch up.
Well... we might not have to contact anyone according to
this! But as bad as it sounds, if one could make the case to
the judge, this might be a very good opportunity for VistA.
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/politics/12031739.htm
With the toll of preventable deaths mounting
Have you ever considered what would happen if you tried to put a
dollar figure on the amount of effort that is expended right here on
this list in trying to make Vista work in a non-VA setting? That
effort is not free, and any effort to evaluate the cost
effectiveness of Vista as a
On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 13:20 -0700, Gregory Woodhouse wrote:
Have you ever considered what would happen if you tried to put a
dollar figure on the amount of effort that is expended right here on
this list in trying to make Vista work in a non-VA setting? That
effort is not free, and any
is being made.
Your efforts and those of many others are part of this progress.
- Original Message -
From: Gregory Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2005 3:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] California's Prisons lack EMR
Have you
I missed this part...
http://www.insidebayarea.com/dailyreview/localnews/ci_2834843
SAN FRANCISCO — A federal judge seized control of medical
care in California's prisons Thursday, deciding to appoint a
receiver to overhaul a $1.1 billion system in which an
inmate needlessly dies every week
I just got told that the DOJ may have adopted VistA for the Bureau of Prisons
some years ago. Does anyone know if it happened and if worked out OK or not?
On Sunday 03 July 2005 05:10 pm, Ismet Kursunoglu wrote:
I missed this part...
13 matches
Mail list logo
