Marc Aylesworth wrote:
>A three layered approach that separates the data, the Model, and the view.
>The data is the database the model contains any business logic and the view
>displays it all. The three parts are designed so that any on part can be
>totally replaced without the other two knowing t
2005 09:07:19 -0500
> To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
>
> Molly,
>
> The reference you provide is a much more extensive and detailed presentation
> of the subject than my paper. It is, at its title in
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 14:36:45 +0800
> To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
>
> Are the documents you referred to at this web-site? The documents were
> last re
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cameron
Schlehuber
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 7:47 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
While looking forward to Richard's response, l
gy, perhaps that document can be located for
you.
Regards,
Richard.
From: Jim Self <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
To:
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
Richard Davis wro
eforge.net
> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 18:46:59 -0600
> To:
> Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
>
> While looking forward to Richard's response, let me chime in here with some
> primitive examples of efforts along the lines of "business ru
be located for
you.
Regards,
Richard.
> From: Jim Self <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
> To:
> Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
>
> Richard Davis wrot
r now that they can afford
to "make mistakes" and risk reaching for something potentially very
productive.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Self
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 4:29 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.
Richard Davis wrote:
>Today, the core database within VistA does not contain a generalized
>"business-rule" engine as a centralized, high level, tabled driven module
>that controls all data storage and retrieval. Classical DHCP applications
>and the VistA modules of today are obliged to embed thei
d.
Regards,
Richard.
From: Greg Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 16:58:40 -0700 (PDT)
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
Indeed, I've taken
19, 2005 7:37 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
FWIW - I'm not sure if the following is functional but at one time the
underlying software functionality anticipated various patient types and
identifiers.
Chec
> From: Nancy Anthracite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 22:43:41 -0400
> To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
>
> I fi
, April 19, 2005 8:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
> Let's just say that I've very surprised, if not shocked, at the kinds
> of things I've seen in released code. Some code is just old, and things
> like creation of subentries through di
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 16:58:40 -0700 (PDT)
> > To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
> >
> > Indeed, I
. It should be noted that IHS has a totally
different registration module from that used in VistA, but it uses
many of the same Fileman fields.
Jim Gray
- Original Message - From: "Nancy Anthracite"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 2:14 PM
Subject
.
> From: Greg Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 16:58:40 -0700 (PDT)
> To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
>
> Indeed, I&#
Let's just say that I've very surprised, if not shocked, at the kinds
of things I've seen in released code. Some code is just old, and things
like creation of subentries through direct sets (including the 0-node)
may be an artifact of age, but...well, I'll leave it at that. Suffice
it to say that s
Indeed, I've taken the approach of using parser driven tools to solve
problems like this, but the problem is harder than you might think.
Consider that the FDA array and IENS string for a DBS call is set up
ahead of time and is very possibly referenced indirectly. I've seen
nodes of files set in th
Message -
From: "Nancy Anthracite" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
So I guess that means that one cannot entirely rely upon the cross
reference
information in the data dictiona
ct: Re: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
So I guess that means that one cannot entirely rely upon the cross reference
information in the data dictionary to track down the potential interactions
with other packages, hence the desire of many to carefully reengineer VistA
before
> From: Nancy Anthracite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 16:14:13 -0400
> To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
>
> So I guess
2005 03:46 pm, Richard G. DAVIS wrote:
> > From: Nancy Anthracite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 10:55:04 -0400
> > To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members]
> From: Nancy Anthracite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 10:55:04 -0400
> To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
>
> Could you p
t;
> > Choose your poison, Mark. ...but, drink some poison you must. :-)
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Richard.
> >
> > > From: "Mark Painter"
> > > Organization: Mark Painter
> > > Reply-To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
&
Nabikus (shr),
I beleive that using an input transform would be the way to just enter desired fields. BUT, some fields are required. You would either have to write custom code to fill these in for you, or modify the database to make them not be required. But as you pointed out, if applications
From: "Mark Painter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > Organization: Mark Painter> > Reply-To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net> > Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 14:06:04 +0200> > To: > > Subject:
[Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan> >> > I am new to
hard.
>
> > From: "Mark Painter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Organization: Mark Painter
> > Reply-To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 14:06:04 +0200
> > To:
> > Subject: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields
e: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 14:06:04 +0200
> To:
> Subject: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
>
> I am new to Vista; have installed Cache and Vista, and it seems to be
> running OK. What I'd like to know is how easy it is to configure Vista
> tables; for
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Configurability of fields in FileMan
>
> I guess a better question... and one that I am thinking of... is there a
> way to set up defaults... so that certain questions aren't even
> asked...
> Such as Veteran status ... etc.
>
> I may be w
I guess a better question... and one that I am thinking of... is there a
way to set up defaults... so that certain questions aren't even
asked...
Such as Veteran status ... etc.
I may be wrong... (and please correct me..)
Is the proper way to do this:
To create a template in Fileman?
And then t
It is not wise to remove tables and fields unless you are really sure
that you have also removed all the references to them. However, unlike
relational databases that have fixed, pre allocated blocks for storage,
Cache does not pre-allocate storage, and if a field is not used, it does
not take spac
I am new to Vista; have installed Cache and Vista, and it seems to be
running OK. What I'd like to know is how easy it is to configure Vista
tables; for example, we would not need SSN, VA numbers, combat service
location etc for patients but we might need other fields which aren't
present in the s
32 matches
Mail list logo
