Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 11:14 AM
Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] Does W ! flush an output buffer?
> Isn't the ascii code for line feed 10
>
> Thanks
>
> Marc Aylesworth
>
> C3I Associates
>
> AFRL/IFSE
>
> Joint Battlespace Infosphere Team
>
> 525 Br
I want to address a cautionary mantra gaining bandwidth on other EHR lists.
"One size does not fit all."
I would like feed back on two hypotheses:
1. Mass customization creates a new era of market leadership.
2. Anyone who can effectively use MS Access, and Excel, can learn FileMan.
Basis:
As a
I think MUMPS is actually more true to the original
ASCII definition of what LF - line feed and CR - carriage
return were originally intended to do. The "\n" format in
C was a combination of LF and CR in its original incarnation.
Like Greg suggests, it's too bad MUMPS is an old language
and does m
-Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of A.
> Forrey
> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 3:35 PM
> To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Does W ! flush an
> output buffer?
>
> Re
Maybe that's because MUMPS is an old language.
===
Gregory Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The whole of science is nothing more than a refinement
of everyday thinking." -- Albert Einstein
On Jul 13, 2005, at 12:06 PM, Kevin Toppenberg wrote:
I think so. But a line feed moves the cursor down
ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Does W ! flush an output buffer?
Remember that the use of the U prior to the W command
controls the effect of the "!" or control character written. Then you
must
switch back to explicitly control several IO devices.
On Wed, 13 Jul
st systems provide a way to define line
> > >> length. This can be used to automatically wrap
> > long
> > >> lines. Common values are 80 and 132. Generally,
> > >> there's a way to turn this off or disable it by
> > >> setting the line length to 0.
ngth. This can be used to automatically wrap
> long
> >> lines. Common values are 80 and 132. Generally,
> >> there's a way to turn this off or disable it by
> >> setting the line length to 0. It looks like some
> of
> >> your lines are wrapping so you are p
"Kevin Toppenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Hardhats Sourceforge"
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 11:47 PM
Subject: [Hardhats-members] Does W ! flush an output
buffer?
I am in the middle of writing a function to display
a
progress bar.
I want the bar to stay on one lin
---Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Kevin
> Toppenberg
> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 2:09 PM
> To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Does W ! flush an
> output buffer?
>
or the ncurses library.
:-)
Kevin
--- Gregory Woodhouse
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, okay, so maybe that's no fun. What you're
> really looking for is
> that MUMPS equivalent of stty cbreak.
> ===
> Gregory Woodhouse
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "It is a capital mistake to theorize before o
EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin
Toppenberg
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 2:09 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Does W ! flush an output buffer?
Maury,
This was the problem. Apparently with M sees a !, it
automatically resets $X, but writing a $ch
XGF seems to be good only if one is completely in
control of all the output to the screen. Otherwise
any writes can mess it up.
As we discussed recently, the XGF demo hangs when I
try to run it, so I have beeen less excited about it.
thanks
Kevin
--- Gregory Woodhouse
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
robably having
> this problem. Again, the solution is to S $X=0 if
> GTM allows that and/or disable line wrapping.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Kevin Toppenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Hardhats Sourceforge"
>
> Sent: Tuesday,
Okay, okay, so maybe that's no fun. What you're really looking for is
that MUMPS equivalent of stty cbreak.
===
Gregory Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data."
--Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
On Jul 13, 2005, at 7:13 AM, Gregory Woodhouse wrote:
Have
Have you considered using XGF?
===
Gregory Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"A practical man is a man who practices the errors of his
forefathers. -- Benjamin Disraeli
On Jul 12, 2005, at 9:47 PM, Kevin Toppenberg wrote:
I am in the middle of writing a function to display a
progress bar.
I w
age -
From: "Kevin Toppenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Hardhats Sourceforge"
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 11:47 PM
Subject: [Hardhats-members] Does W ! flush an output buffer?
>I am in the middle of writing a function to display a
> progress bar.
>
>
I am in the middle of writing a function to display a
progress bar.
I want the bar to stay on one line, so at the end of
each line, I need to do something to get back to the
beginning of line.
My first approach was to write the line, then write a
$char(13) to go back to the beginning of the line,
18 matches
Mail list logo
