that is not an inpatient.
- Original Message -
From: Jim Self [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 8:07 PM
Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] How to obtain a write access of ~ ?
I would appreciate more detailed discussion on this point if possible
Kevin, you have gained good insights into VistA through your dogged
exploration of it.
Other systems built on a relational database likely have business rules
that are not in the database itself, so the business logic is important
for maintaining the tables properly. Just going in with a
that is not an inpatient.
- Original Message -
From: Jim Self [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 8:07 PM
Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] How to obtain a write access of ~ ?
I would appreciate more detailed discussion on this point
oran
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of
steven mcphelan
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 7:53 AM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] How to obtain a write access of "~"
?
This "^" wri
. I do not know the consequences of putting a value in
this field
for a patient that is not an inpatient.
- Original Message -
From: Jim Self [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 8:07 PM
Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] How
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] How to obtain a write access of ^ ?
I suspect something else must be going on. I tried setting the write
protection to ^ (BTW, you can do this because the field sits by
itself on a global node in the DD) and, sure enough, DUZ(0)=@ does
trump ^, just as Marianne
I would appreciate more detailed discussion on this point if possible. It would
seem from
what you write that such fields cannot be properly edited from the Fileman DBS
API. If so,
that would seem to present a severe impediment to any attempts to put a more
modern
general database driven user
It seems to me that VistA is not just a database, with
secondarily important routines to adjust that data.
Instead, it seems that it is both. Thus this locked
database field is not supposed to be altered except
through the proper channels (the program code.)
So it may well be problematic trying
Since this seems to be a new issue for Kevin and he has been crawling around
in VistA for a while now, is this sort of field not rare as hen's teeth?
I would think that some internal policy in the VA might be responsible for
locking up this field. For instance, perhaps they did not want
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] How to obtain a write access of ^ ?
Stephen;
Then that sounds like the loading of this field is programatic (data
loaded
at the time of the action being recorded) and doesn't use Fileman to
Fill
the field. That would keep most users (except
iate data updates and linkages.
tjh
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris
Richardson
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 2:34 AM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] How to obtain a write access of "^&
urceforge.netSubject: Re: [Hardhats-members]
How to obtain a write access of "^" ?
BUFFER ERROR That should have been 'it is a way', not 'it was
a want'. If only I could keep my typing buffer in sync with my thinking
buffer ;-)Greg Kreis wrote:
Has this
been changed? It used
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] How to obtain a write access of ^ ?
Stephen;
Then that sounds like the loading of this field is programatic (data
loaded
at the time of the action being recorded) and doesn't use Fileman to
Fill
the field. That would keep most users (except
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Chris
Richardson
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 2:34 AM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] How to obtain a write access of ^
?
Stephen;
Then that sounds like the loading of this field is programatic
(data
loaded
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg
Woodhouse
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 10:58 AM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] How to obtain a write access of ^ ?
Does this trick offer any advantages over using the Uneditable Data
option
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Chris
Richardson
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 2:34 AM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] How to obtain a write access of ^
?
Stephen;
Then that sounds like the loading of this field
Hello all,
I want to edit fields .104 (PROVIDER) and .1041
(ATTENDING PHYSICIAN) in file 2 (PATIENT file). I
have a fileman code of @
In the data dictionary, these two fields have a code
of ^ required. I assume this means that my DUZ(0)
must contain a ^. This is normally loaded (I believe)
As you might guess, that's a trick that is sometimes employed to
discourage unauthorized fiddling with sensitive files. Off the top of
my head, I'm not sure if Fileman will complain if you set DUZ(0)
programmatically to ^ before attempting an update, but I believe this
will work.
--- Kevin
Take a look at the FILE MANAGE ACCESS CODE field in file 200. Maybe you can
put a ^ there with D P^DI and then see what happens.
On Sunday 13 February 2005 05:14 pm, Kevin Toppenberg wrote:
Hello all,
I want to edit fields .104 (PROVIDER) and .1041
(ATTENDING PHYSICIAN) in file 2 (PATIENT
I also thought @ was a master access setting. But
here is a screen log of what I am seeing.
GTMzwr DUZ
DUZ=90
DUZ(0)=@
DUZ(1)=
DUZ(2)=69
DUZ(AG)=O
DUZ(AUTO)=1
DUZ(BUF)=1
DUZ(LANG)=1
GTMd ^XUP
Setting up programmer environment
Terminal Type set to: C-VT102
Select OPTION NAME: diedit
INPUT
-members] How to obtain a write access of ^ ?
Maybe it is because you don't have a patient who has been admitted! Note
that
it says inpatient below.
On Sunday 13 February 2005 09:18 pm, Nancy Anthracite wrote:
I noted that only active providers are allowed, so do your docs have the
PROVIDER
of it.
- Original Message -
From: steven mcphelan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2005 7:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] How to obtain a write access of ^ ?
If a field is write protected with the ^ then no DUZ(0) will allow you
22 matches
Mail list logo
