Hi,
I remember listening in on a Hardhats con-call recently about
using the GPL for more and more parts of VistA. Given Stallmans
appearance on the last call I wondered if this might be an appropriate
time to bring the issue up.
For me this is a central issue. The GPL provides the
.
/David.
David Sommers, Architect | Dialog Medical
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fred
Trotter
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 5:26 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Hardhats-members] VistA GPL
Hi,
I remember
If your comment is in regards to the work done under FOIA / Public
Domain, then I believe it's in Medsphere's rights to continue that work
in a non-OSS format and profit from it.
No, its an issue of the GPL versus copyright licenses which prevent the
user who is individually licensing
with no greed and no lawlessness, this would not be an
issue.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ruben
Safir
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 5:19 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] VistA GPL
If your comment
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 17:48 -0600, Gordon Moreshead wrote:
There are ways to make source code available to end users while
maintaining
proprietary rights to software.
It's proprietary rights to software which is the root problem, is it
not. And what does that have to do with profitability?
YAY!!
oh wait... I don't think I am supposed to cheer just yet.
:/
Emmanuel.
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 14:26 -0700, Fred Trotter wrote:
Hi,
I remember listening in on a Hardhats con-call recently about
using the GPL for more and more parts of VistA. Given Stallmans
appearance
