evidence that the process persists.
...sigh
Regards,
Richard.
From: Tom Munnecke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 13:32:09 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Walter Reeds Records to be Digitalized for
$3.7 million
Arden,
I
Arden,
I think more than a forum for dialog is necessary... for VA and DoD
to share anything would involve someone losing some bureaucratic turf.
Unfortunately, this protection-of-turf instinct is more important
than cost savings, patient safety, effectiveness of systems, or even
the mission of
http://www.modernphysician.com/news.cms?newsId=2931
To bad the DOD just didn't put in VistA years ago. Looks like now they will
be scanning in their records. It's saddening.
--
Nancy Anthracite
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT
Nancy and hardhats:
As many hardhats know DoD developed CHCS from VistA in the late 1980s;
SAIC was the contractor. There is much commonality in the architectures of
the two systems but there has been relatively little cross dialog about
the common conceptual content of the two architectures.
I just made two mistakes. This is the first one. Walter Reed does use CHCS
I. A big bird just told me.
On Wednesday 15 December 2004 12:54 pm, Nancy E. Anthracite wrote:
http://www.modernphysician.com/news.cms?newsId=2931
To bad the DOD just didn't put in VistA years ago. Looks like now
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of A. Forrey
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 1:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Walter Reeds Records to be Digitalized for
$3.7 million
Nancy and hardhats:
As many hardhats know DoD developed CHCS from VistA in the late 1980s;
SAIC
