Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 11:14 AM
Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] Does W ! flush an output buffer?
> Isn't the ascii code for line feed 10
>
> Thanks
>
> Marc Aylesworth
>
> C3I Associates
>
> AFRL/IFSE
>
> Joint Battlespace Infosphere Team
>
> 525 Br
I want to address a cautionary mantra gaining bandwidth on other EHR lists.
"One size does not fit all."
I would like feed back on two hypotheses:
1. Mass customization creates a new era of market leadership.
2. Anyone who can effectively use MS Access, and Excel, can learn FileMan.
Basis:
As a
I think MUMPS is actually more true to the original
ASCII definition of what LF - line feed and CR - carriage
return were originally intended to do. The "\n" format in
C was a combination of LF and CR in its original incarnation.
Like Greg suggests, it's too bad MUMPS is an old language
and does m
-Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of A.
> Forrey
> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 3:35 PM
> To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Does W ! flush an
> output buffer?
>
> Re
Maybe that's because MUMPS is an old language.
===
Gregory Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The whole of science is nothing more than a refinement
of everyday thinking." -- Albert Einstein
On Jul 13, 2005, at 12:06 PM, Kevin Toppenberg wrote:
I think so. But a line feed moves the cursor down
ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Does W ! flush an output buffer?
Remember that the use of the U prior to the W command
controls the effect of the "!" or control character written. Then you
must
switch back to explicitly control several IO devices.
On Wed, 13 Jul
Yes, but the $X and $Y values are dependent on the last USE command. Think
of them as attributes associated with each device object.
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Toppenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats
I am doing this with a:
use $P write "screen info here." use IO
Is this correct?
Kevin
--- "A. Forrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Remember that the use of the U prior to
> the W command
> controls the effect of the "!" or control character
> written. Then you must
> switch back to expli
Remember that the use of the U prior to the W command
controls the effect of the "!" or control character written. Then you must
switch back to explicitly control several IO devices.
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Kevin Toppenberg wrote:
Maury,
This was the problem. Apparently with M sees a !, it
a
---Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Kevin
> Toppenberg
> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 2:09 PM
> To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Does W ! flush an
> output buffer?
>
or the ncurses library.
:-)
Kevin
--- Gregory Woodhouse
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, okay, so maybe that's no fun. What you're
> really looking for is
> that MUMPS equivalent of stty cbreak.
> ===
> Gregory Woodhouse
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "It is a capital mistake to theorize before o
EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin
Toppenberg
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 2:09 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Does W ! flush an output buffer?
Maury,
This was the problem. Apparently with M sees a !, it
automatically resets $X, but writing a $ch
XGF seems to be good only if one is completely in
control of all the output to the screen. Otherwise
any writes can mess it up.
As we discussed recently, the XGF demo hangs when I
try to run it, so I have beeen less excited about it.
thanks
Kevin
--- Gregory Woodhouse
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Maury,
This was the problem. Apparently with M sees a !, it
automatically resets $X, but writing a $char(13)
doesn't. This seems kind of an odd mechanism.
I was switching back and forth between writing files
out to a file and writing the progress on the screen.
It seems that there is only ONE
Okay, okay, so maybe that's no fun. What you're really looking for is
that MUMPS equivalent of stty cbreak.
===
Gregory Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data."
--Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
On Jul 13, 2005, at 7:13 AM, Gregory Woodhouse wrote:
Have
Have you considered using XGF?
===
Gregory Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"A practical man is a man who practices the errors of his
forefathers. -- Benjamin Disraeli
On Jul 12, 2005, at 9:47 PM, Kevin Toppenberg wrote:
I am in the middle of writing a function to display a
progress bar.
I w
It would help to to know what your code looks like and exactly what you want
the output to look like, but let me offer a couple of thoughts:
1. If you are using the ? tab format character, you need to let GTM know the
position of the cursor. Using ! sets $X to 0. An escape sequence might set
17 matches
Mail list logo
