PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg
Woodhouse
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 2:18 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Re: CPRS Source Code Subversion Repository
--- Chris Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it is worth
doing
- Original Message -
From: Aylesworth Marc A Ctr AFRL/IFSE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 7:35 AM
Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] Re: CPRS Source Code Subversion Repository
But after it is done it should be improved upon until
On 8/29/05, James Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not necessarily. It depends on the purpose of doing it. (Note that it is
not necessarily software or anything to do with computers.) If the purpose
was because it was fun to do or to teach yourself something you do not need
to go past just
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 2:18 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Re: CPRS Source Code Subversion Repository
--- Chris Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it is worth
doing,
it is worth doing poorly.
:-)
Even
On 8/29/05, Ruben Safir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is this called Source Code subversion?
Do you mean, What is the origin of the name Subversion for this
repository software?
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.0/ch01s02.html
In February 2000, they contacted Karl Fogel, the author of Open
On 8/26/05, Kevin Toppenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking of the Borland framework, I think it is an amazing work of
Art. I have always been disappointed that it is not taken more
seriously in the programming community. It seems that everyone turns
up their noses as sniffs that its
, 2005 5:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Re: CPRS Source Code Subversion Repository
On 8/26/05, Kevin Toppenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking of the Borland framework, I think it is an amazing work of
Art. I have always been disappointed that it is not taken more
seriously
--- Chris Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it is worth
doing,
it is worth doing poorly.
:-)
Even if it is *worth* doing poorly, I certainly hope it is not
obligatory to do so!
===
Gregory Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more
to
. ;^)
Chris
- Original Message -
From: Mike Lieman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 5:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Re: CPRS Source Code Subversion
Repository
On 8/26/05, Kevin Toppenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 5:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Re: CPRS Source Code Subversion Repository
On 8/26/05, Kevin Toppenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking of the Borland framework, I think it is an amazing work of
Art. I have always been disappointed
10 matches
Mail list logo
