On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 06:44, Kevin Toppenberg wrote:
[KSB] ...snip...
Just for the record, we REALLY need to work on making
our interfaces more understandable.
The prompt
Input device: terminal:
is actually asking for a file
I was hitting enter (after all, I was interacting with
Thanks Bhaskar, but I think this is VistA code, not
GT.M code, isn't it?
Thanks
Kevin
--- K.S. Bhaskar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 06:44, Kevin Toppenberg wrote:
[KSB] ...snip...
Just for the record, we REALLY need to work on
making
our interfaces more
Quick question:
if I see a command like this:
DO RTN1,RTN2,RTN3:(A1)
Then does the postconditional operator affect the
calling of functions RTN1 RTN2 RTN3, or just RTN3?
I think it is just RTN3
Thanks
Kevin
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Check out the
Looks like a GT.M prompt from the %RI utility.
- Bhaskar
On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 11:42, Kevin Toppenberg wrote:
Thanks Bhaskar, but I think this is VistA code, not
GT.M code, isn't it?
Thanks
Kevin
***
This electronic
It's not a VistA prompt ... but for that matter, M isn't that much different
from Linux with regard terminals and files ... to M (I suppose) files
are simply a special kind of terminal :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin
Toppenberg
Your intuition is correct.
only three Standard MUMPS commands have postconditional operators that apply
to their arguments.The DO command, the GOTO command, and the XECUTE command.
Quick question:
if I see a command like this:
DO RTN1,RTN2,RTN3:(A1)
Then does the postconditional
You are correct!
By definition, in M/umps:
command arg1,arg2, ... is equivalent to:
command arg1 command arg2 ...
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Toppenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Hardhats Sourceforge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 10:44 AM
Subject:
You're right, just RTN3
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin
Toppenberg
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 9:44 AM
To: Hardhats Sourceforge
Subject: [Hardhats-members] Easy M syntax question
Quick question:
if I see a command like this:
It is just RTN3.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Toppenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Hardhats Sourceforge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 9:44 AM
Subject: [Hardhats-members] Easy M syntax question
Quick question:
if I see a command like this:
DO RTN1,RTN2,RTN3:(A1)
Reminder ... the VistA Community conference call
will now occur on the 1st and 3rd Friday of each month.
Friday at Noon EST
Anyone interested in VistA is invited.
Send agenda items to:
Claudine Beron at HP
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Next call:
Date: 11/05/2004
Time: Noon EST
Call-in number:
AMIA says they support the IEEE position at
http://www.ieeeusa.org/policy/positions/healthcareidentifier.html
No number proposed yet, so we don't know how big to make that field. ;-)
--
Nancy Anthracite
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored
Thanks everyone. You all are a great help.
Kevin
--- Maury Pepper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are correct!
By definition, in M/umps:
command arg1,arg2, ... is equivalent to:
command arg1 command arg2 ...
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Toppenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wise men say, only fools rush in
Well, throwing all caution to the wind, I decided to
get ZTMGRSET working properly on my system. What was
wrong with the way it was? It wasn't finding the
files it needed to copy that are specific for GT.M. I
have written about this before.
I figured out
13 matches
Mail list logo
