RE: [H] -LO- CNet does a test workout: Dual Core AMD vs. Dual Core Intel

2005-12-01 Thread Hayes Elkins
@hardwaregroup.com Subject: [H] -LO- CNet does a test workout: Dual Core AMD vs. Dual Core Intel Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:43:06 -0600 http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-10442_7-6389077-9.html?tag=btn Interesting. The ref would have stopped the fight in the real world.

Re: [H] -LO- CNet does a test workout: Dual Core AMD vs. Dual Core Intel

2005-12-01 Thread James Boswell
a true 3Ghz CPU. Which of course just OBLITERATES any intel offering. From: CW [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com Subject: [H] -LO- CNet does a test workout: Dual Core AMD vs. Dual Core Intel Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:43:06

[H] -LO- CNet does a test workout: Dual Core AMD vs. Dual Core Intel

2005-11-28 Thread CW
http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-10442_7-6389077-9.html?tag=btn Interesting. The ref would have stopped the fight in the real world.

Re: [H] -LO- CNet does a test workout: Dual Core AMD vs. Dual Core Intel

2005-11-28 Thread Steve Tomporowski
One of the comments mentioned that NForce SLI consistently under-performed with Intel chips. Of course, as with people that usually make those statements, he left no link for verification. Is this true or is the comparison as shown, correct? My tendency would be to go with NForce over Intel (that