At 10:21 PM 08/01/2009, DHSinclair wrote:
Thane (et.al.),
I finished a 24hr cycle using the WinDiag Ram test. No errors. For
now this is a good result. I have some confidence in the remaining
dimm I am using ATM. But, as you say, not really conclusive!
By your metric, I'm not sure there
At 01:20 AM 09/01/2009, Bryan Seitz wrote:
btw if it aint: http://www.memtest.org/
it sux :)
Of course, it doesn't work very well, except on really, really bad
RAM. But it's a start. I'm still looking for something capable of
quickly and definitively testing RAM. I have a program that
Windows is a pretty reliable diagnostic tool for determining when you have
bad RAM.
Unfortunately, it's also a pretty good diagnostic tool for dozens of other
problems and always makes you guess which problem is causing which symptom
:)
---
Brian Weeden
Technical
Thane,
OK. I did also run the dimm with memtest+ v2.11 for 24+ hours (~47 passes)
w/o any errors. I will now wind it up again and just let it run for the
week. :)
Thanks,
Duncan
At 08:00 01/12/2009 -0400, you wrote:
At 10:21 PM 08/01/2009, DHSinclair wrote:
Thane (et.al.),
I finished
At 10:00 AM 12/01/2009, Bryan Seitz wrote:
Doesn't exist :)
Well, I think the hardware ones might do what I want, but I can't
convince the powers that be that we should invest ~ $3500 US in a RAM
tester. :)
T
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 08:02:24AM -0400, Thane Sherrington wrote:
At 01:20
At 10:10 AM 12/01/2009, Brian Weeden wrote:
Windows is a pretty reliable diagnostic tool for determining when you have
bad RAM.
Unfortunately, it's also a pretty good diagnostic tool for dozens of other
problems and always makes you guess which problem is causing which symptom
:)
Yeah, the
At 12:07 PM 12/01/2009, Bryan Seitz wrote:
We have a few at work and they work so-so not gonna be much if
at all better than memtestplus :(
Well that's unfortunate. I guess I'm stuck running long tests. Oh well.
T
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Thane Sherrington wrote:
At 12:07 PM 12/01/2009, Bryan Seitz wrote:
We have a few at work and they work so-so not gonna be much if at all
better than memtestplus :(
Well that's unfortunate. I guess I'm stuck running long tests. Oh well.
Even beyond that, $3500
At 01:00 PM 12/01/2009, Christopher Fisk wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Thane Sherrington wrote:
At 12:07 PM 12/01/2009, Bryan Seitz wrote:
We have a few at work and they work so-so not gonna be much if
at all better than memtestplus :(
Well that's unfortunate. I guess I'm stuck running
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Thane Sherrington wrote:
At 01:00 PM 12/01/2009, Christopher Fisk wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Thane Sherrington wrote:
At 12:07 PM 12/01/2009, Bryan Seitz wrote:
We have a few at work and they work so-so not gonna be much if at
all better than memtestplus :(
Thane (et.al.),
I finished a 24hr cycle using the WinDiag Ram test. No errors. For now
this is a good result. I have some confidence in the remaining dimm I am
using ATM. But, as you say, not really conclusive!
By your metric, I'm not sure there will ever be a conclusive position.
OK.
The
btw if it aint: http://www.memtest.org/
it sux :)
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 09:21:22PM -0500, DHSinclair wrote:
Thane (et.al.),
I finished a 24hr cycle using the WinDiag Ram test. No errors. For now
this is a good result. I have some confidence in the remaining dimm I am
using ATM. But,
At 01:02 PM 07/01/2009, DHSinclair wrote:
Thane,
Have you tried this RAM diagnostic tool from MS?
http://oca.microsoft.com/en/windiag.asp
Just wondering? Finally got its' dot-iso burned to a CD-r/w, and it
is now running. I am trying to certify the remaining dimm in my
suspect new PC. So
Thane,
Yes, proving a good dimm seems like proving a double-negative!!! Not
likely; well until we have a definitive standard's based diagnostic
module. But, the way thinks change so quickly, I now understand your
frustration.. :)
Best,
Duncan
At 13:12 01/07/2009 -0400, you wrote:
14 matches
Mail list logo
